Measurement of the integrated luminosities of the data taken by BESIII at √
                    <i>s</i>
                    = 3.650 and 3.773 GeV

Ablikim, M.; Ачасов, М. Н.; Albayrak, O.; Ambrose, D.; An, F. F.; An, Q.; Bai, J. Z.; Ferroli, R. Baldini; Ban, Y.; Becker, J.; Bennett, J. V.; Bertani, M.; Bian, J. M.; Boger, E.; Bondarenko, O.; Boyko, I. R.; Braun, S.; Briere, R. A.; Bytev, V.; Cai, H.; Cai, X.; Çakır, O.; Calcaterra, A.; Cao, G. F.; Çetin, S. A.; Chang, J. F.; Chelkov, G.; Chen, G.; Chen, H. S.; Chen, J. C.; Chen, M. L.; Chen, S. J.; Chen, X. R.; Chen, Y. B.; Cheng, H. P.; Chu, Y. P.; Cronin-Hennessy, D.; Dai, H. L.; Dai, J. P.; Dedovich, D.; Deng, Z. Y.; Denig, A.; Denysenko, I.; Destefanis, M.; Ding, W. M.; Ding, Y.; Dong, L. Y.; Dong, M. Y.; Du, S. X.; Fang, J.; Fang, S. S.; Fava, L.; Feng, C. Q.; Friedel, P.; Fu, C. D.; Fu, J.; Fuks, O.; Gao, Y.; Geng, C.; Goetzen, K.; Gong, W. X.; Gradl, W.; Greco, M.; Gu, M. H.; Gu, Y. T.; Guan, Y. H.; Guo, A. Q.; Guo, L. B.; Guo, Tingting; Guo, Y. P.; Han, Y. L.; Harris, F. A.; He, K. L.; He, M.; He, Z. Y.; Held, T.; Heng, Y. K.; Hou, Z. L.; Chen, Hu; Hu, H. M.; Hu, J.; Hu, T.; Huang, G. M.; Huang, G. S.; Huang, J. S.; Huang, L. Q.; Huang, X. T.; Huang, Y.; Hussain, T.; Ji, C. S.; Ji, Q.; Ji, Q.; Ji, X. B.; Ji, X. L.; Jiang, L. L.; Jiang, X. S.; Jiao, J. B.; Jiao, Z.; Jin, D. P.; Jin, S.; Jing, F.; Kalantar‐Nayestanaki, N.; Kavatsyuk, M.; Kloss, B.; Kopf, B.; Kornicer, M.; Kuehn, W.; Lai, W.; Lange, J. S.; Lara, M.; Larin, P.; Leyhe, M.; Li, C. H.; Li, Cheng; Li, Cui; Li, D. M.; Li, F.; Li, G.; Li, H. B.; Li, J. C.; Li, K.; Li, Lei; Li, P. R.; Li, Q. J.; Li, W. D.; Li, W. G.; Li, X. L.; Li, X. N.; Li, X. Q.; Li, X. R.; Li, Z. B.; Liu, Han; Liang, Y. F.; Liang, Y. T.; Liao, G. R.; Lin, D. X.; Liu, B. J.; Liu, C. L.; Liu, C. X.; Liu, Fangyu; Liu, Fang; Liu, Feng; Liu, H. B.; Liu, H. H.; Liu, H. M.; Liu, J. P.; Liu, K.; Liu, K. Y.; Liu, P. L.; Liu, Q.; Liu, S. B.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y. B.; Liu, Z. A.; Liu, Zhiqiang; Liu, Zhiqing; Loehner, H.; Lou, X.; Lu, G. R.; Lü, H. J.; Lü, J. G.; Lü, X. R.; Lu, Y. P.; Luo, C. L.; Luo, M. X.; Luo, T.; Luo, X. L.; Lv, M.; C., F.; L., H.; M., Q.; Ma, Songde; Ma, Tian; Y., X.; Maas, F. E.; Maggiora, M.; Malik, Q. A.; Mao, Y.; Mao, Z. P.; Messchendorp, J. G.; Min, J.; Min, T. J.; Mitchell, R. E.; Mo, X. H.; Moeini, H.; Morales, C. Morales; Moriya, K.; Muchnoi, N. Yu.; Muramatsu, H.; Nefedov, Y.; Nikolaev, I. B.; Ning, Z.; Nisar, S.; Olsen, S. L.; Ouyang, Q.; Pacetti, S.; Park, J. W.; Pelizaeus, M.; Peng, H.; Peters, K.; Ping, J. L.; Ping, R. G.; Poling, R.; Prencipe, E.; Qi, M.; Qian, S.; Qiao, C. F.; Liu, Qin; Qin, X. S.; Qin, Yao; Qin, Z. H.; Qiu, J. F.; Rashid, K. H.; Redmer, C. F.; Rong, G.; Ruan, X. D.; Sarantsev, A.; Shao, M.; Shen, C. P.; Shen, X. Y.; Sheng, H. Y.; Shepherd, M. R.; Song, W. M.; Song, X. Y.; Spataro, S.; Spruck, B.; Sun, G. X.; Sun, J. F.; Sun, S.; Sun, Y. J.; Sun, Y. Z.; Sun, Z. J.; Sun, Z. T.; Tang, C. J.; Tang, X.; Tapan, I.; Thorndike, E. H.; Toth, D.; Ullrich, M.; Uman, I.; Varner, G.; Wang, B.; Wang, D.; Wang, D. Y.; Wang, K.; Wang, L. L.; Wang, L. S.; Wang, M.; Wang, P.; Wang, P. L.; Wang, Q. J.; Wang, S. G.; Wang, X. F.; Wang, X. L.; Wang, Y. D.; Wang, Y. F.; Wang, Y. Q.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Z. G.; Wang, Z. H.; Wang, Z. Y.; Wei, D. H.; Wei, J. B.; Weidenkaff, P.; Wen, Q. G.; Wen, S. P.; Werner, M.; Wiedner, U.; Wu, L. H.; Wu, N.; Wu, S. X.; Wu, W.; Wu, Z.; Xia, L.; Xia, Y.; Xiao, Z. J.; Xie, Y.; Xiu, Q. L.; Xu, G. F.; Xu, Q. J.; Xu, Qing; Xu, X. P.; Xu, Z.; Xue, Z.; Yan, L.; Yan, W. B.; Yan, W. C.; Yan, Y. H.; Yang, H. X.; Yang, Yifan; Ye, H.; Ye, M.; Ye, M. H.; Yu, B. X.; Yu, C. X.; Yu, H. W.; Yu, J. S.; Yu, Shiqi; Yuan, C. Z.; Yuan, Y.; Zafar, A. A.; Zallo, A.; Zang, S. L.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, B. X.; Zhang, B. Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, C. C.; Zhang, D. H.; Zhang, H. H.; Zhang, H. Y.; Zhang, J. Q.; Zhang, J. W.; Zhang, J. Y.; Zhang, J. Z.; Zhang, Lili; Zhang, S. H.; Zhang, X. J.; Zhang, X. Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. H.; Zhang, Z. P.; Zhang, Z. Y.; Zhang, Zhenghao; Zhao, G.; Zhao, J. W.; Liu, Zhao; Zhao, Ling; Zhao, M. G.; Zhao, Q.; Zhao, S. J.; Zhao, T. C.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, Y. B.; Zhao, Z.; Zhemchugov, A.; Zheng, B.; Zheng, J. P.; Zheng, Y.; Zhong, B.; Li, Zhou; Zhou, X. R.; Zhou, X. K.; Zhou, X. R.; Zhu, K.; Zhu, Xiaoyu; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, Y. S.; Zhu, Z. A.; Zhuang, J.; Zou, B. S.; Zou, J. H.

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/37/12/123001

Cited by 135 publications

(83 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The BESIII collaboration has collected 1.31 × 10 9 e + e − → J/ψ events, more than 500 × 10 6 e + e − → ψ(2S ) events, 2.9 fb −1 at the ψ(3770) peak, and more than 10 fb −1 in the center-of-mass region above 4 GeV, which are devoted to studies of the charmonia and charmonium-like states [21][22][23]. Additional data have been acquired for a τ-mass scan and a high statistics R-scan.…”

Section: The Besiii Detector At Bepciimentioning

confidence: 99%

The γγ Physics Program at BESIII

Redmer

2018

EPJ Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. A key motivation for the two-photon physics program of the BESIII collaboration is the need of high precision data on electromagnetic transition form factors as input to the calculations of the contribution of hadronic Light-by-light scattering to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. The data collected with the BESIII detector allow to study the momentum dependence of the form factors at small momentum transfers, which is of special relevance for a µ . In this presentation the ongoing measurements of the transition form factors of π 0 , η and η mesons, as well as pion pairs, are discussed, and the potential for first double-tagged measurements at BESIII are pointed out.

show abstract

Section: The Besiii Detector At Bepciimentioning

confidence: 99%

The γγ Physics Program at BESIII

Redmer

2018

EPJ Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To avoid this complication and to improve the statistics, instead of a DT technique, we reconstruct only one D 0 orD 0 decay in the ψ(3770) → D 0D0 process. The observed yield is normalized to the total number of the D 0D0 pairs, which can be obtained as N D 0D0 = L × σ(e + e − → ψ(3770) → D 0D0 ), using the integrated luminosity L of our sample [9] and the previously measured cross section σ(e + e − → D 0D0 ) = (3.607 ± 0.017(stat.) ± 0.056(syst.))…”

Section: Improved Measurement Ofmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(7) The uncertainty of the determination of N D 0D0 is determined based on Refs. [9,10]. The resultant relative uncertainties are shown in Table III.…”

Section: Improved Measurement Ofmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Search forD0→γγand improved measurement of the branching fraction forD0→π0<

Ablikim¹,

Ачасов²,

Ai³

et al. 2015

Phys. Rev. D

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using 2.92 fb −1 of electron-positron annihilation data collected at √ s = 3.773 GeV with the BESIII detector, we report the results of a search for the flavor-changing neutral current process D 0 → γγ using a double-tag technique. We find no signal and set an upper limit at 90% confidence level for the branching fraction of B(D 0 → γγ) < 3.8 × 10 −6 . We also investigate D 0 -meson decay into two neutral pions, obtaining a branching fraction of B(D 0 → π 0 π 0 ) = (8.24 ± 0.21(stat.) ± 0.30(syst.)) × 10 −4 , the most precise measurement to date and consistent with the current world average.

show abstract

“…During 2010 and 2011, a data sample with an integrated luminosity of 2.93 fb −1 [9] was collected with the BESIII detector at a center-of-mass energy ffiffi ffi s p ¼ 3.773 GeV. In e þ e − annihilations at this energy, D mesons are produced in pairs with no additional particles and can serve as an ideal test-bed to systematically study D decays.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurements of the branching fractions of the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays D0→ωη , η(′)
Ablikim¹,
Ачасов²,
Ahmed³
et al. 2018
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
2
0
1
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

By analyzing a data sample of 2.93 fb −1 collected at ffiffi ffi s p ¼ 3.773 GeV with the BESIII detector operated at the BEPCII storage rings, we measure the branching fractions BðD 0 → ωηÞ ¼ ð2.15 AE 0.17 stat AE 0.15 sys Þ × 10 −3 , BðD 0 → ηπ 0 Þ ¼ ð0.58 AE 0.05 stat AE 0.05 sys Þ × 10 −3 , BðD 0 → η 0 π 0 Þ ¼ ð0.93 AE 0.11 stat AE 0.09 sys Þ × 10 −3 , BðD 0 → ηηÞ ¼ ð2.20 AE 0.07 stat AE 0.06 sys Þ × 10 −3 and BðD 0 → η 0 ηÞ ¼ ð0.94 AE 0.25 stat AE 0.11 sys Þ × 10 −3 . We note that BðD 0 → ωηÞ is measured for the first time and that BðD 0 → ηηÞ is measured with much improved precision.

show abstract

Measurement of the integrated luminosities of the data taken by BESIII at √ s = 3.650 and 3.773 GeV

Cited by 135 publications

References 4 publications

The γγ Physics Program at BESIII

The γγ Physics Program at BESIII

Search forD0→γγand improved measurement of the branching fraction forD0→π0<

Measurements of the branching fractions of the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays D0→ωη , η(′)
Ablikim¹,
Ачасов²,
Ahmed³
et al. 2018
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
2
0
1
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Measurement of the integrated luminosities of the data taken by BESIII at √ s = 3.650 and 3.773 GeV

Cited by 135 publications

References 4 publications

The γγ Physics Program at BESIII

The γγ Physics Program at BESIII

Search forD0→γγand improved measurement of the branching fraction forD0→π0<

Measurements of the branching fractions of the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays D0→ωη , η(′)Ablikim1, Ачасов2, Ahmed3 et al. 2018Phys. Rev. DSelf Cite2010View full textAdd to dashboardCite

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Measurements of the branching fractions of the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays D0→ωη , η(′)
Ablikim¹,
Ачасов²,
Ahmed³
et al. 2018
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
2
0
1
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite