Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-7763-8_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Induced Magnetic Field in a Flawed Tube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We noticed that the flaw signal from the radial sensor was, in general, about two to three times as large as the corresponding (for the same exciting field) axial signal. This is partly due to the fact that the sensor is much closer to the wall of the tube [3]. Flaw fields were successfully measured at different frequencies by small sensors in the presence of a uniform exciting field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We noticed that the flaw signal from the radial sensor was, in general, about two to three times as large as the corresponding (for the same exciting field) axial signal. This is partly due to the fact that the sensor is much closer to the wall of the tube [3]. Flaw fields were successfully measured at different frequencies by small sensors in the presence of a uniform exciting field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of sensors are needed to span the inner perimeter of the tube. Sensors must be oriented to measure primarily the axial (paralleI to tube axis) and radial (perpendicular to tube axis) magnetic field components [3]. The computer model requires that twenty five frequencies be used.…”
Section: Purdue University School Of Electrical Engineering West Lafamentioning
confidence: 99%