2014
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/51/3/l9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of thespeed-of-lightperturbation of free-fall absolute gravimeters

Abstract: We report on a direct measurement of the relativistic Doppler shift with a commercial free-fall absolute gravimeter of the type FG5X. The observed Doppler shift, which is commonly called speed-of-light perturbation, can be well described by the relativistic Doppler formula, where the constant object velocity is replaced by a time-dependent velocity with constant acceleration. The observed speed-of-light perturbation stands in contrast to other publications, which predict a higher frequency shift. It has been b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result is caused by other perturbations not accounted in the analysis. We have analyzed only one perturbation and found that its magnitude is about 10 times higher than reported in [1]. It's possible that the analysis of other perturbations can also benefit from the review by other researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The result is caused by other perturbations not accounted in the analysis. We have analyzed only one perturbation and found that its magnitude is about 10 times higher than reported in [1]. It's possible that the analysis of other perturbations can also benefit from the review by other researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The formula for the speed-of-light perturbation of the acceleration [2] used in the analysis yields 14.18 µGal ‡ for the longest drops in both sets, so the one-third of the correction is 4.73 µGal. However, on the fig.4 of [1] (FF set) this difference reaches only 2.2 µGal, and on the fig.5 (LF set) it is only 1.1 µGal. Besides being much lower than the right value, the LF and FF results disagree between themselves, even though the longest drops are the same in both sets.…”
Section: Some Problems With the Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations