1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1492(199912)12:8<495::aid-nbm594>3.0.co;2-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the extracellular pH of solid tumours in mice by magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a comparison of exogenous19F and31P probes

Abstract: Precise measurement of pHe in vivo may be of clinical value for both diagnosis and selection of therapy. pHe measurements made by the 31P probe 3‐aminopropylphosphonate (3‐APP) were compared with those made by the 19F probe, 3‐[N‐(4‐fluor‐2‐trifluoromethylphenyl)‐sulphamoyl]‐propionic acid (ZK‐150471) in three solid tumour types, human HT29 xenografts, murine RIF‐1 fibrosarcomas and Lettre tumours grown subcutaneously in mice. No significant differences were observed when probe measurements of pHe were compare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
145
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
145
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The cell viability expressed in this study is relative to those at each pH in the absence of DOX and micelles and the direct pH effect on the cell viability was not monitored with the MCF-7 cell line. The change in pH from 7.4 to 6.0 may influence cell surface charges and cellular physiology and viability, noting that the low pH is a favorable environment for tumor cells but has detrimental effect on normal cells [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Ph-dependent Cell Cytotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cell viability expressed in this study is relative to those at each pH in the absence of DOX and micelles and the direct pH effect on the cell viability was not monitored with the MCF-7 cell line. The change in pH from 7.4 to 6.0 may influence cell surface charges and cellular physiology and viability, noting that the low pH is a favorable environment for tumor cells but has detrimental effect on normal cells [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Ph-dependent Cell Cytotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extracellular pH (pH e ) in most tumors is more acidic (pH 6.5-7.2) than in normal tissues [27][28][29]. In all measurements (involving either invasive or noninvasive methods) of the pH e of human and animal solid tumors, more than 80% of all measured values consistently fall below a pH of 7.2 [27][28][29]. The development of pH-sensitive drug-carriers therefore maybe a unique strategy and confer advantages over using external stimuli, such as hyperthermia [5] and ultrasound [6] which require exact location of tumors for triggered release [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH values measured in most solid tumors range from 5.7 to 7.8, with a mean of 7.0 (Ojugo et al, 1999). The essential part of a pH-sensitive drug delivery system is a pH-triggering group (an ionizable weak acidic or basic moiety) that is attached to the backbone.…”
Section: Ph-sensitive Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, it is exploited that the extracellular pH of tumor tissues is more acidic than the pH of the surrounding healthy tissues. 141 Moreover, the pH of intracellular lysosomes or endosmomes is shifted to more acidic values than the cytosolic pH. 142 Based on these considerations, Das et al…”
Section: Temperature-sensitive Microgelsmentioning
confidence: 99%