1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.67.2418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the e^{+}e^{-} Invariant-Mass Distribution in p¯p Collisions at s=1.8 TeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to observe multiscale fluctuations, we have assumed a particular hierarchy in the Hamiltonian following the general scenario of a gradual complexification of a collective motion until it reaches the compound nucleus chaotic states. It is in fact the implicit assumption of many simulations such as the extended mean-field approach which takes into account the two-body collisions as a damping mechanism [32,37,38,39,40]. In these cases, a hierarchy of couplings is implicitly assumed, the main ansatz being that cutting this hierarchy at any level leads to an approximate strength which is only slightly modified when the next level is introduced.…”
Section: Critical Discussion Of the Doorway Hierarchy Picturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to observe multiscale fluctuations, we have assumed a particular hierarchy in the Hamiltonian following the general scenario of a gradual complexification of a collective motion until it reaches the compound nucleus chaotic states. It is in fact the implicit assumption of many simulations such as the extended mean-field approach which takes into account the two-body collisions as a damping mechanism [32,37,38,39,40]. In these cases, a hierarchy of couplings is implicitly assumed, the main ansatz being that cutting this hierarchy at any level leads to an approximate strength which is only slightly modified when the next level is introduced.…”
Section: Critical Discussion Of the Doorway Hierarchy Picturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the higher-dimensional nature of L, it is obvious that the consequent effects would be more pronounced at higher energies. In other words, the fractional deviation over the SM expectations would be concentrated more at higher invariant masses M [15], with possibly some nontrivial dependence on the rapidity y as well [16]. For example, composite quarks and electrons have been proposed as a possible explanation for the high-Q 2 anomaly at HERA [17].…”
Section: Jhep01(2006)027mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the analysis of the data, it is by and large established that standard statistical theory could not account for the observed large multiplicity of the prescission neutrons. This discrepency is, nowadays, believed to be of dynamical origin, and thus led to enormous activities to understand theoretically the dynamics of fission process [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been different approaches to study this problem. One approach is to solve the Langevin equations for the collective variables [11,12,14,15]. In this approach, one assumes the collective variable as the 'Brownian particle' interacting stochastically with large number of internal degrees of freedom constituting the surrounding 'bath'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%