1962
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/27.3.261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Dimensions of Fish to Facilitate Calculations of Echo-Strength in Acoustic Fish Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Andreeva and Chindonova (1964) simplified equation (2) io(H + 30)^/ 2 f. = 1.5 (Vbi) i/3 where f^is in kHz, H is the depth in meters, and W^\ is the volume of the swimbladder in mm^. From Haslett's consideration of fish dimensions (Haslett, 1962), fish volume is related to fish length (L) by the expression Vfi3h = 0.01 l3. 4Following Marshall's assumption (1951) that the volume of the swimbladder in a marine fish is about 5 percent of the volume of the fish, the swimbladder volume can be expressed as Vbi = 5 X 10 ""^l 3, (5) By combining equations (3) and 5an expression is given for fish length as 'r where L is in cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andreeva and Chindonova (1964) simplified equation (2) io(H + 30)^/ 2 f. = 1.5 (Vbi) i/3 where f^is in kHz, H is the depth in meters, and W^\ is the volume of the swimbladder in mm^. From Haslett's consideration of fish dimensions (Haslett, 1962), fish volume is related to fish length (L) by the expression Vfi3h = 0.01 l3. 4Following Marshall's assumption (1951) that the volume of the swimbladder in a marine fish is about 5 percent of the volume of the fish, the swimbladder volume can be expressed as Vbi = 5 X 10 ""^l 3, (5) By combining equations (3) and 5an expression is given for fish length as 'r where L is in cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swimbladders have been considered to be the dominant scattering mechanism based on estimates that swimbladders cause as much as 90-95% of the target strength of fish under certain conditions due to the large acoustic contrast between the air-filled swimbladder and the surrounding tissue and water (Foote, 1980). Their influences on the acoustic signatures have been studied intensively by Jones and Pearce (1958), Andreyeva (1964), Weston (1967, Haslett (1962c), Hawkins (1977), Love (1978) and Foote (1980Foote ( , 1985. While the size and shape of swimbladders may dominate the scattering properties of fish, other parts of the anatomy create acoustic impedance contrasts which contribute, particularly for fish without swimbladders, to the overall scattering, e.g., skull, vertebral column, muscle tissue and gonads.…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At swimbladder resonance frequencies, backscattering cross section varies with fish size and frequency. In the geometric scattering region at higher frequencies, it depends on multiple scattering features in the fish which wil cause interference in a manner specific to its anatomy, and that interference pattern is dependent upon frequency (Haslett, 1962c). In other words, the physical separation of scattering features in the fish relative to acoustic wavelength determines the interference pattern.…”
Section: Behavior and Physiological Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%