2011
DOI: 10.3938/jkps.59.3177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Diffusion Coefficients of Fluorescence Beads and Quantum Dots by Using Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For freely diffusing QD655, the diffusion times of τ D1 = 2.34 ± 0.14 ms ( f 1 = 73%) and τ D2 = 0.04 ± 0.01 ms ( f 2 = 27%) were determined. The diffusion time τ D1 corresponded to the unhindered diffusion of QD655 and fits very well with data from a previous study reporting τ D = 2.78 ms for quantum dots in PBS 40 . In comparison with freely diffusing organic dyes such as fluorescein, rhodamine 6G or Atto655-carboxylic acid with sizes in the range of ~0.5 nm, this diffusion is 55 times slower, because of the larger particle size of quantum dots 63,64 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For freely diffusing QD655, the diffusion times of τ D1 = 2.34 ± 0.14 ms ( f 1 = 73%) and τ D2 = 0.04 ± 0.01 ms ( f 2 = 27%) were determined. The diffusion time τ D1 corresponded to the unhindered diffusion of QD655 and fits very well with data from a previous study reporting τ D = 2.78 ms for quantum dots in PBS 40 . In comparison with freely diffusing organic dyes such as fluorescein, rhodamine 6G or Atto655-carboxylic acid with sizes in the range of ~0.5 nm, this diffusion is 55 times slower, because of the larger particle size of quantum dots 63,64 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The presence of a second diffusion component with the diffusion time τ D2 was not entirely clear. A possible explanation could be the unstable blinking of quantum dots due to the surface charge density, induced by a pH change from pH 9 in borate buffer to pH 7 in PBS as well as the used excitation light intensities 40,65 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical diffusion is determined with a 3D version of the 2D method of Bailey (Bailey 2017) as 1.2 10 -9 m 2 /s for the used time-step and mesh-size. This is approximately 5000 larger than the diffusion calculated using the Stoke-Einstein equation (Han et al 2011) for the passive fluorescent fluid tracers used in the mixing experiments. In principle, the numerical diffusion can be tuned by varying the time-step and mesh-size, however, attempts to do this led to numerical instabilities and convergence problems.…”
Section: Mixingmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Additionally, maximum and minimum transmitted energies are observed for the PBS and fructose–water solution, respectively. It should be noted that the PBS solution is the most viscous material among the tested materials [ 17 ]. However, the fructose–water solution exhibits the lowest viscosity [ 18 ] among them because the addition of fructose in water lowers its viscosity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%