1982
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90081-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the cross section of the reaction pn → ppπ− in the energy region of dibaryon resonances (500–1000 MeV)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 by the dashed line, which is arbitrarily adjusted in height to the data. The data [32,45] presented in Fig. 7 follow this expectation by exhibiting an increasing cross section with increasing energy up to about √ s ≈ 2.30 GeV.…”
Section: The Dibaryon-induced Model For the S-wave N N Interactionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 by the dashed line, which is arbitrarily adjusted in height to the data. The data [32,45] presented in Fig. 7 follow this expectation by exhibiting an increasing cross section with increasing energy up to about √ s ≈ 2.30 GeV.…”
Section: The Dibaryon-induced Model For the S-wave N N Interactionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Fig.7(Color online) The N N -induced isoscalar single-pion production cross section in dependence of the total c.m. energy √ s. Shown are the recent results from WASA-at-COSY[32] (solid circles) together with earlier results[45] at lower energies. The dashed line shows the expected energy dependence based on t-channel Roper excitation[32,46], the solid line a Lorentzian fit to the data with m = 2315 MeV and Γ = 150 MeV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The main reason for this situation is due to the difficulty to create a pure monoenergetic neutron beam. Therefore most previous experiments used either a continuous neutron beam in a fairly wide energy range [1] or investigated the pn-interaction with a proton beam and a deuteron target as a neutron source [2,3,4]. Of course, it is worth to mention the works where the energies of neutrons were defined using the timeof-flight technique [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the situation for σ 01 was not clear in the past. Several experiments reported significant σ 01 values below 600 MeV [28,29,30,31,32], while others found small or even negligible σ 01 contributions for energies up to 750 MeV [33,34,35]. A partial wave analysis of Arndt and Verwest [36] gave no significant σ 01 contribution below 1 GeV while Bystricky et al [37] found small, but non-negligible values in a similar analysis.…”
Section: Determination Of σ 01mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, due to the different particle masses in the final states of the reactions np → ppπ − and np → nnπ + , the cross section data can not be compared at the same beam energies. The T n values of Kleinschmidt [70,28,30,38,31,33,71,34,35]. Full line: prediction of the Jülich model [10,72].…”
Section: Integrated Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%