1963
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.132.728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Atomic Scattering Factor of Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe

Abstract: of three J=\ holes coupled to a spin of / = |. Using (r n *) = RM m with i^0=1.2X10-13 cm, we obtain (2=+0.09 b. This is considerably smaller than the measured quadrupole moment, and conceivably is due to configuration mixing or small deformations of the nuclear core. The only other shell-model state likely to contain the 61 st proton is d 5/ 2, but this is not allowed because the configuration (d 5/ 2) 3 coupling to 7=f is forbidden by the Pauli principle.On the assumption that the nuclear core of Pm 151 is h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Parts of each of these tables have been confirmed by x-ray measurements. 21 The velocities associated with the thermal motion and the recoil of the target atoms are more important in neutron scattering than in x-ray scattering because they may cause a significant change in the neutron wavelength. However, it was determined that the effect of this on the scattering factor can be neglected.…”
Section: The Atomic Scattering Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Parts of each of these tables have been confirmed by x-ray measurements. 21 The velocities associated with the thermal motion and the recoil of the target atoms are more important in neutron scattering than in x-ray scattering because they may cause a significant change in the neutron wavelength. However, it was determined that the effect of this on the scattering factor can be neglected.…”
Section: The Atomic Scattering Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several experiments have been carried out to measure the * yangke@sinap.ac.cn † lfzhu@ustc.edu.cn differential cross section of x-ray elastic scattering of noble gases [5][6][7], the detectors used in these works, i.e., the intrinsic Ge planar detector [5,6] and the scintillation counter [7], have an energy resolution of only about several hundred eV, which may resolve the elastic scattering and the Compton scattering at large scattering angles, but they cannot resolve the elastic scattering and inelastic excitations because the excitation energy of the valence shell transition of atoms and molecules is less than 25 eV, which is much less than the energy resolution of these detectors. Furthermore, the ionization continuum also contributes to the elastic scattering in these experiments due to the same reason.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are the nonrelativistic [12] and relativistic [13] nonlocal FF and ISF of Hubbell et al Beyond the IPA, some results for FF and ISF exist [14][15][16]. Other corrections include the anomalous scattering factor (ASF) for Rayleigh scattering and the coherent nuclear Thomson (NT) amplitude.Very few experiments have been reported for scattering from free atoms [17][18][19][20], the case for which cross sections are usually calculated. In view of the basic need for accurate and absolute measurements in free atoms to assess the importance of various approximations, we have explored scattering from neon at 90 ± in the 11 to 22 keV range where sizable differences (up to 16%) between the S-matrix and nonlocal exchange form-factor calculations of the elastic scattering channel exist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few experiments have been reported for scattering from free atoms [17][18][19][20], the case for which cross sections are usually calculated. In view of the basic need for accurate and absolute measurements in free atoms to assess the importance of various approximations, we have explored scattering from neon at 90 ± in the 11 to 22 keV range where sizable differences (up to 16%) between the S-matrix and nonlocal exchange form-factor calculations of the elastic scattering channel exist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%