2018
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2018-12429-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the 234U(n, f ) cross-section with quasi-monoenergetic beams in the keV and MeV range using a Micromegas detector assembly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, 234 U and 238 U samples produced at the IPPE (Obninsk) and JINR (Dubna) with the painting technique were used for the fission cross section measurements. They are actinide disks (5 µm thickness, ~ 5.2 cm diameter) deposited on a 100 µm Al backing [10,11]. In the front side of the samples (which is going to be measured with the micromegas detector) aluminum masks were placed (0.6 mm thickness, 5.0 diameter) so that all the samples have the same dimensions (see Fig.…”
Section: Determination Of the Sample Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present work, 234 U and 238 U samples produced at the IPPE (Obninsk) and JINR (Dubna) with the painting technique were used for the fission cross section measurements. They are actinide disks (5 µm thickness, ~ 5.2 cm diameter) deposited on a 100 µm Al backing [10,11]. In the front side of the samples (which is going to be measured with the micromegas detector) aluminum masks were placed (0.6 mm thickness, 5.0 diameter) so that all the samples have the same dimensions (see Fig.…”
Section: Determination Of the Sample Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the experimental data for the 234 U(n,f) cross section, several datasets exist in literature, however, for neutron energies between 14 and 18 MeV, there are only 7 datasets [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] that present significant discrepancies (12-60%). Therefore, the purpose of this work was to lessen the aforementioned discrepancies and apart from that, to complete the meauserements of the 234 U(n,f) reaction over a wide energy range by combining the present project with two previous ones published by A. Tsinganis et al [10] and A. Stamatopoulos et al [11]. The final data of the present work have been submitted in the proceedings of the 2019 International Conference On Nuclear Data for Science and Technology (May 19-24 2019, Beijing, China), and they are going to be published on EPJ Web of Conferences during 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…3. Given this simulated neutron fluence and the evaluated cross section of the 238 U reference target, the reaction rate can be calculated by multiplying the fission cross section with the simulated neutron fluence, following the methodology described in detail in [8] . The ratio of the integrated reaction rate corresponding to the main neutron beam to the total integrated reaction rate, provides the contribution =?9@ of the scattered parasitic neutrons to the recorded fission yield.…”
Section: Fission Yield and Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%