2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73335-5_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Suitability of a Haptic Device in a Virtual Reality System

Abstract: In the context of the optimization of the mechanical platform of a virtual reality system involving a haptic device, this paper introduces two tools in order to help the designer for obtaining the best positioning of the device respect to the application workspace. With this purpose we have defined a measure called Average Volumetric Manipulability, of how the application workspace fits in with the volume where haptic device provides its best performance. Also, we have defined other measure called Useful Manip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the Sina flex master manipulator in the case of work space and dexterity is investigated in compared with some proposed master manipulator/haptic interfaces by the other researchers 8–10,12–17,19,29,30 in Table 2. The workspace volume of the commercial devices including PHANTOM Omni, 8,29 PHANTOM Premium, 9 PHANTOM Desktop, 10,30 Sigma.7 15 and Omega.7 17 is as 134.4 × 10 4 , 194.2986 × 10 5 , 230.4 × 10 4 , 368.59 × 10 4 , 221.17 × 10 4 mm 3 , respectively. The analysis of the corresponding dexterity is available only for PHANTOM Omni and PHANTOM Desktop as maximum of I M = 0.8, minimum of I M = 0.011 and trueGCI˜=0.419 $\widetilde{GCI}=0.419$ respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performance of the Sina flex master manipulator in the case of work space and dexterity is investigated in compared with some proposed master manipulator/haptic interfaces by the other researchers 8–10,12–17,19,29,30 in Table 2. The workspace volume of the commercial devices including PHANTOM Omni, 8,29 PHANTOM Premium, 9 PHANTOM Desktop, 10,30 Sigma.7 15 and Omega.7 17 is as 134.4 × 10 4 , 194.2986 × 10 5 , 230.4 × 10 4 , 368.59 × 10 4 , 221.17 × 10 4 mm 3 , respectively. The analysis of the corresponding dexterity is available only for PHANTOM Omni and PHANTOM Desktop as maximum of I M = 0.8, minimum of I M = 0.011 and trueGCI˜=0.419 $\widetilde{GCI}=0.419$ respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the Sina flex master manipulator in the case of work space and dexterity is investigated in compared with some proposed master manipulator/haptic interfaces by the other researchers [8][9][10][12][13][14][15][16][17]19,29,30 For the haptic interfaces presented in 12,14,16 and, 19 the volume of the workspace is respectively as 351.91 � 10 6 mm 3 , 195.35 � 10 6 mm 3 , 540 � 10 5 mm 3 , and 225 � 10 4 mm 3 . The dexterity for these manipulators is analysed as I c < 0.2, 12 I c < 0.5 14 and FI = 1.73, 19 where, FI is the global kinematic performance fluctuant index.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%