1990
DOI: 10.1016/0277-9390(90)90020-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of subject scatter in the superintendent of documents classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance between documents is one such objective factor. The informational similarity between documents is likewise objective if information is objectively measured as is done by Shannon and others (Boyce et al, 1990, Losee, 1990. Given these objective quantities, how might a classification system be "customized" for a particular collection, assuming that classification systems should not be the same for all collections?…”
Section: What Is the Cost Of Placing Similar Or Dissimilar Documents mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance between documents is one such objective factor. The informational similarity between documents is likewise objective if information is objectively measured as is done by Shannon and others (Boyce et al, 1990, Losee, 1990. Given these objective quantities, how might a classification system be "customized" for a particular collection, assuming that classification systems should not be the same for all collections?…”
Section: What Is the Cost Of Placing Similar Or Dissimilar Documents mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluations of document subject classification schemes have generally been based on subjective or qualitative criteria. Quantitative studies have examined the "scatter" imposed by moving documents from one classification scheme to another (Boyce et al, 1990), or used information theoretic measures to compare the information commonalities between documents placed physically adjacent to one another under a particular scheme (Losee, 1992). This present work is novel in its data mining approach to detecting patterns in library circulation data, and its focus on subject co-occurrences at the user transaction level.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%