2013
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of stream cross section using ground penetration radar with Hilbert–Huang transform

Abstract: Abstract:This study presents a new method to measure stream cross section without having contact with water. Compared with conventional measurement methods which apply instruments such as sounding weight, ground penetration radar (GPR), used in this study, is a non-contact measurement method. This non-contact measurement method can reduce the risk to hydrologists when they are conducting measurements, particularly in high flow period. However, the original signals obtained by using GPR are very complex, differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, no clear algorithm to discern the different interfaces (air‐water and water‐riverbed) was provided either in Spicer et al () or Costa et al (). Recently, Chen, Kao, and Wu () applied Hilbert–Huang transform to post‐process the GPR signals. Their results showed that the non‐contact method to measure the channel cross‐sectional geometry was precise and quick.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, no clear algorithm to discern the different interfaces (air‐water and water‐riverbed) was provided either in Spicer et al () or Costa et al (). Recently, Chen, Kao, and Wu () applied Hilbert–Huang transform to post‐process the GPR signals. Their results showed that the non‐contact method to measure the channel cross‐sectional geometry was precise and quick.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed that the non‐contact method to measure the channel cross‐sectional geometry was precise and quick. However, the study of Chen et al () only focused on the measurements of channel cross section; the application for the estimation of stream discharge was not discussed. Overall, GPR is capable of mapping stream cross‐sectional profile under high‐flow conditions, especially when the conventional methods of measuring are either unsafe or inadequate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the two parabolic curves in the image indicate the receiving electromagnetic signals are affected by the pier foundations of the Mingchu Bridge. 3.3 Post-processing of the GPR data (Chen, 2014) After identifying the air-water and water-riverbed interfaces, the GPR image is converted into the river cross-sectional profile; water depth is obtained after multiplying the signal traveling time with the speed of the electro-magnetic wave in water (≈ 0.033 m/ns). Fig.…”
Section: Measurement Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, no algorithm was provided in Spicer et al (1997) or Costa et al (2006) to distinguish between the air-water and water-riverbed interfaces. In order to reduce the subjective judgement on the GPR images, Chen et al (2014) employed Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT) to post-process the GPR signals. Overall, GPR is a technology for mapping stream cross-sectional profile at high flow, particularly under conditions when conventional methods are either unsafe or inadequate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on former researches (Huang and Wu 2008;Rao and Hsu 2008;Chen et al 2014), we make use of HHT to decompose the water stage in the estuary. The HHT is used in geophysical researches and also in mechanical inspection (Yan and Gao 2006), financial analysis (Huang et al 2003), turbulent flow and structural inspection measurement (Huang and Attoh-Okine 2005;Huang and Shen 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%