2000
DOI: 10.1007/s100520000465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of spin observables in neutron-proton elastic scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting from N 4 LO, we found that setting the maximum fitting energy E max lab ∼ 250 MeV leads to stable results for the LECs and phase shifts for all employed cutoff values in the range of Λ = 350 − 550 MeV. Given the abundance of np spin-observables available at the energies around E lab ∼ 260 MeV and coming from the recent experiments of [94][95][96], we decided to set E max lab = 260 MeV at this chiral order. We will address the sensitivity of our results on the choice of E max lab in section VII E. At N 3 LO, we fit up to E lab = 200 MeV while the maximum energy of included scattering data at LO, NLO and N 2 LO is chosen to be E lab = 25, 100 and 125 MeV.…”
Section: Fitting Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from N 4 LO, we found that setting the maximum fitting energy E max lab ∼ 250 MeV leads to stable results for the LECs and phase shifts for all employed cutoff values in the range of Λ = 350 − 550 MeV. Given the abundance of np spin-observables available at the energies around E lab ∼ 260 MeV and coming from the recent experiments of [94][95][96], we decided to set E max lab = 260 MeV at this chiral order. We will address the sensitivity of our results on the choice of E max lab in section VII E. At N 3 LO, we fit up to E lab = 200 MeV while the maximum energy of included scattering data at LO, NLO and N 2 LO is chosen to be E lab = 25, 100 and 125 MeV.…”
Section: Fitting Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(10a)-(10c). Since there is few experimental data of corresponding pn observables [25], the uncertainty in the pn amplitudes used in this work is not small. Thus, I have evaluated the pn amplitudes inversely from the calculated response functions, R c , R L , and R T , and the experimental data of I(0 • ), D N N (0 • ), and D LL (0 statistical ones with respect to the averaging procedure, and effects of the experimental error are not taken into account.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%