2017
DOI: 10.23939/chcht11.04.420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of SF6 using gc-ecd: a comparative study on the utilization of CO2-N2 mixture and CH4-ar mixture as a make-up gas

Abstract: Abstract.1 Comparison of 10% CO 2 -N 2 and 5% CH 4 -Ar gas mixture as a make-up of gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC-ECD) for the measurement of sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) was investigated. It was found that 10% CO 2 -N 2 shows the make-up characteristic comparable to 5% CH 4 -Ar. Thus, 10% CO 2 -N 2 is considerable as an alternative to 5% CH 4 -Ar.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intraday precision of the method was observed by seven times injecting the SGM-1 under optimized GC-TCD, while interday precision was observed using the same procedure in different days (Zuas, Budiman & Hamim 2017). The percentage of relative standard deviation (%RSD) obtained from the repetitions was then compared with the coeffi cient of variance (CV) Horwitz.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Intraday precision of the method was observed by seven times injecting the SGM-1 under optimized GC-TCD, while interday precision was observed using the same procedure in different days (Zuas, Budiman & Hamim 2017). The percentage of relative standard deviation (%RSD) obtained from the repetitions was then compared with the coeffi cient of variance (CV) Horwitz.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak area of the SGM-2's chromatogram was compared with SGM-1's to determine the measured value of target components in the SGM-1's. The difference between the gravimetric concentrations of each component (See Table 1) and the measured values were then calculated in order to determine bias of the method (Zuas, Budiman & Hamim 2017). This bias value can be compared with the method uncertainty, which was combined from standard deviation and the SGM's certifi ed uncertainty (Budiman & Zuas 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, CRMs are limited, high cost, and could not cover the large type of samples. Internal reference materials developed by a laboratory for its internal use have been produced in enabling CRM's to be used on a less frequent basis and reducing measurement cost [3], [4]. The internal reference material might be upgraded to a national reference material after analyzed by other certified laboratories and guaranteed by the country's agency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%