2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of scapular medial border and inferior angle prominence using a novel scapulometer: A reliability and validity study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 The distance of posterior displacement of the ROS and IFA of the scapula from the thoracic wall was measured with a scapulometer to represent the degree of scapular dyskinesis. 9 The ICC values for intrarater reliability were in the range of 0.996 to 0.998 (SEM, 0.2-0.3 mm; MDC 95 , 0.6-0.7 mm) in this study, and those for interrater reliability were 0.95 to 0.99 (SEM, 0.7-0.8 mm) in previous research. 9 Detailed information of the conscious control program has been presented previously.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…18 The distance of posterior displacement of the ROS and IFA of the scapula from the thoracic wall was measured with a scapulometer to represent the degree of scapular dyskinesis. 9 The ICC values for intrarater reliability were in the range of 0.996 to 0.998 (SEM, 0.2-0.3 mm; MDC 95 , 0.6-0.7 mm) in this study, and those for interrater reliability were 0.95 to 0.99 (SEM, 0.7-0.8 mm) in previous research. 9 Detailed information of the conscious control program has been presented previously.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…1). This scapulometer-based screening method was designed to measure the distance from the inferior angle to the thorax wall, and has been estimated to have excellent reliability (intra-rater and inter-rater correlation coefficient) and fair validity (Du et al, 2017). Table 1 shows the demographic data of the participants.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a reliable clinical method to diagnose SD has not yet been developed because of (i) difficulties in observing scapular motions in multiple plans without other muscles and soft tissues and (ii) the absence of clinical assessment compared to a standard for quantifying SD [22]. Some clinical methods have been described with good reproducibility, even though their validity and reliability require further investigations [12,55,[90][91][92][93][94][95]. A simple field-based test measuring winging, a lack of control during shoulder motions, and scapula asymmetry, has shown high reliability in musculoskeletal pre-participation screening [96].…”
Section: Clinical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a clinical evaluation seems to be appropriate only in the diagnosis of dyskinesis type I because of a lack of evidence of the effectiveness for type II and III [64,105]. To quantify the features of SD types I and II, a novel scapulometer has been investigated, resulting in an excellent reliability and validity [95]. Furthermore, through plain-film radiography, the coracoid upward shift distance and length of the scapular spine line could be measured; differences in each parameter between the two sides can be correlated to type I and type II of SD, respectively [106].…”
Section: Clinical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%