1988
DOI: 10.1038/sc.1988.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of residual urine volume by means of ultrasonic scanning: a comparative study

Abstract: SUIlunaryThe basis for this paper was 107 ultrasonic examinations of the bladder in 20 patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. The residual urine volume was estimated in three different ways. The bladder was emptied by catheterisation immediately after the ultrasonic examinations. Of the three methods, number 2 was found to give the most accurate estimate of residual urine volume.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many imaging techniques have been reported based on their comparison and correlation studies to diagnose precisely renal malformations. For this purpose, ultrasonography is routinely practiced [9]. Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is recommended if ultrasonography diagnoses scarring, hydronephrosis, or other findings suggestive of obstructive uropathy or vesicoureteral reflux [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many imaging techniques have been reported based on their comparison and correlation studies to diagnose precisely renal malformations. For this purpose, ultrasonography is routinely practiced [9]. Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is recommended if ultrasonography diagnoses scarring, hydronephrosis, or other findings suggestive of obstructive uropathy or vesicoureteral reflux [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the largest picture appears on the screen, freeze the image and measure the width (w), depth (d), and cross-sectional area (AT) of the bladder. According to previous studies (14) , the residual volume is approximately equal to the cross-sectional area of the bladder when measured in the sagittal plane multiplied by the width of the bladder. SCI-QOL measurement system will assess the quality of life.…”
Section: Secondary Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Different correction coefficients can be used to define the bladder volume as a cuboid (F=0.89), sphere (F=0.52), ellipsoid cylinder (F=0.79), triangular prism (F=0.50) [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100], [101]. Bih et al proposed an optimal correction coefficient of 0.72 as a result of linear regression analysis, leading to a mean volume estimation error of 17.4%±11.6% [102].…”
Section: ) Ultrasound Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%