2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2006.11.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of relative K X-ray intensity ratio following radioactive decay and photoionization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X-rays are produced in different ways, such as photoninduced, proton-induced, ion-induced, and radioactive decay followed by X-ray emission (electron capture (EC) process and internal conversion (IC) of gamma transitions). It is reported that the change in the charge of nucleus and recoiling of the nucleus during EC process affects the X-ray emission probabilities [1,2]. On the contrary, this effect is not observed to be there when X-rays are produced via photon excitation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…X-rays are produced in different ways, such as photoninduced, proton-induced, ion-induced, and radioactive decay followed by X-ray emission (electron capture (EC) process and internal conversion (IC) of gamma transitions). It is reported that the change in the charge of nucleus and recoiling of the nucleus during EC process affects the X-ray emission probabilities [1,2]. On the contrary, this effect is not observed to be there when X-rays are produced via photon excitation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, this effect is not observed to be there when X-rays are produced via photon excitation methods. Therefore, values of K shell X-ray intensity ratios following EC decay are different from the values obtained from photon-induced excitations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. The K shell X-ray intensity ratios of elements following photoionization have been extensively studied by several researchers employing reflection geometry methods [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%