1950
DOI: 10.1007/bf03399014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of relative interface energies in twin related crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, the most significant trends for the R3 misorientation are that the maximum energy occurs for the (1 1 1) twist boundary and the minima occur in the zone of orientations at 90°to this position. For Fe, this agrees with the results calculated by Kim et al [19] and the experimental study [13,54]. The most significant trends for the R9 misorientation are that the minimum energy occurs for the (1 1 0) twist boundary and the maxima occur in the zone of orientations at 90°to this position.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4, the most significant trends for the R3 misorientation are that the maximum energy occurs for the (1 1 1) twist boundary and the minima occur in the zone of orientations at 90°to this position. For Fe, this agrees with the results calculated by Kim et al [19] and the experimental study [13,54]. The most significant trends for the R9 misorientation are that the minimum energy occurs for the (1 1 0) twist boundary and the maxima occur in the zone of orientations at 90°to this position.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The relatively low energy of the (1 1 2) coherent twin boundary is consistent with its measured relative energy in Fe [13,54,56] and Mo [57]. It should also be noted that the ratio of the coherent twin boundary energy to the average R3 boundary energy in Fe (0.25) and Mo (0.26) are very close to the measured energy ratio of the coherent twin boundary and ordinary grain boundaries in silicon ferrite reported as 0.22 by Dunn et al [54].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For the case of the R3 boundary, for example, the peak is centered on the symmetric tilt {112} plane, which has lower interplanar spacing compared with the pure twist {111} plane (i.e., low index), where the minimum distribution was located. This is consistent with experimental measurements [27] and a recent simulation, [14] shown in Figure 11(a), revealing that the {112} twin grain boundary plane in bcc structure is lower in energy than the {111} plane. To fully examine this hypothesis, the planar coincident site density (PCSD) was calculated using PCSD = B/(h 2 + k 2 + l 2 ) 1/2 for a number of low CSL grain boundary configurations and compared with their populations as shown in Table I and Figure 12. Here B is the number of atoms per unit cell in the lattice, i.e., two for body centered cubic and four for face centered cubic materials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The energy ratio of the coherent twin boundary and average R3 GB in Mo is 0.26 [96]. It is close to the similar ratio in Fe (0.25, [62,97,98]) and to the energy ratio of the coherent twin boundary and ordinary GBs in Fe-Si alloys (0.22, [97]). These ratios are much higher than those for the fcc metals (for example, the coherent twin energy in fcc Ni is reported as 0.064 J/m 2 , or 0.058 of the average boundary energy [42]).…”
Section: Faceting-roughening Of Twin Grain Boundaries In Other Materialssupporting
confidence: 65%