2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.12.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of real-time PM2.5 mass, sulfate, and carbonaceous aerosols at the multiple monitoring sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency distribution of PM 2.5 mass concentration in this study is shown in Figure 2 and is similar to that in 2000 [ Balasubramanian et al , 2003]. Higher PM 2.5 on hazy days was also observed in other comparative studies [ Chen et al , 2003; Jeong et al , 2004], suggesting that hazy days are associated with increased loading of atmospheric particulates. This is because the increased concentration of atmospheric particles between the observer and the object can absorb or scatter light from the sun.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The frequency distribution of PM 2.5 mass concentration in this study is shown in Figure 2 and is similar to that in 2000 [ Balasubramanian et al , 2003]. Higher PM 2.5 on hazy days was also observed in other comparative studies [ Chen et al , 2003; Jeong et al , 2004], suggesting that hazy days are associated with increased loading of atmospheric particulates. This is because the increased concentration of atmospheric particles between the observer and the object can absorb or scatter light from the sun.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The SPA method differs from a prototype SPA used in previous studies 910,13 : The primary difference between the two methods was the converter oven temperature and configuration. In the prototype, the converter oven, with a stainless steel coil, was set at 800–900 °C, with the first 10 min of every hour used for zero mode (SO 2 background).…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The impact of the fires was observed at ground level at several mid-Atlantic sites, as well as the entire northeastern United States for several days in early July. 162 In Philadelphia, increases in ground-level concentrations of sulfate, 227 OC and EC, 145 and PM 2.5 mass, as well as O 3 and scattering coefficients by LIDAR (light detection and radar) 228 were observed because of the fires. Increases also were observed for PM 2.5 mass, OC, EC, and LIDAR aerosol backscatter in Baltimore, 191,229 whereas increases in OC and sulfate in Pittsburgh, 182,193 and mass, OC, and sulfate in NYC 41,188 were noted as a result of the Quebec fires.…”
Section: Local and Regional Pmmentioning
confidence: 97%