Measurement of reaction cross section for proton-rich nuclei (A&lt;30) at intermediate energies

Zhang, H.Y.; Shen, W. Q.; Ren, Zhongzhou; Ma, Yugang; Jiang, Wei-Zhou; Zhang, Zhu; Cai, X. Z.; Fang, DQ; Chen, Zhong; Yu, Lingfei; Wei, Yongzhuang; Wang, Zhan; Guo, Zhimou; Xiao, Guoqing; Wang, J.S.; Wang, J.C.; Wang, Q.J.; Li, J.X.; Wang, M.; Chen, Z.Q.

doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(02)01007-2

Cited by 91 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(Note that one cannot [17,18], while the σR data for 12 C+ 12 C reactions are taken from Refs. [8,10,15,16,19,20,21,22,23,24]. For reference, we also plot σBS = 4πa(C) 2 , where a(C) is determined from the measured angle of the first diffraction peak of proton elastic scattering, by squares.…”

Section: Measurements Of Interaction Cross Sections Have Been Done Fomentioning

confidence: 99%

Difference between interaction cross sections and reaction cross sections

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We revisit the commonly accepted notion that the difference between interaction and reaction cross sections is negligible at relativistic energies, and show that, especially in small mass number region, it is large enough to help probe nuclear structure. For analyses of the difference, we construct "pseudo data" for the reaction cross sections using a phenomenological black-sphere model of nuclei since empirical data are very limited at high energies. The comparison with the empirical interaction cross sections suggests a significant difference between the reaction and interaction cross sections for stable projectiles on a carbon target, which is of the order of 0 − 100 mb.

show abstract

Section: Measurements Of Interaction Cross Sections Have Been Done Fomentioning

confidence: 99%

Difference between interaction cross sections and reaction cross sections

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…8 shows the results of the differences between the cross sections of 18 Ne, 20 Mg, 22 Si and 16 O and the lower panel shows those between 20 Ne, 22 Mg, 24 Si, 26 S and 18 O. Fig.…”

Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this section, we present the numerical results of the charge density distributions and charge radii from the RMF model, and the charge form factors from the REA method for the nuclei 16 O, 18 Ne, 20 Mg, 22 Si with neutron number N = 8, the nuclei 18 O, 20 Ne, 22 Mg, 24 Si, 26 S with N = 10, 40 Ca, 42 Ti, 44 Cr, 46 Fe, 48 Ni with N = 20 and 48 Ca, 50 Ti, 52 Cr, 56 Ni with N = 28. And, along with these results, we also give our detailed discussions.…”

Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of the isotonic shifts of charge form factor for the light proton-rich nuclei

Wang

Ren

2007

Nuclear Physics A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Currently, the nuclear models in SHIELD-HIT are modified by adjusting the parametrization of the ineleastic cross sections (Barashenkov 1993) for ions heavier than protons to more recent experimental data from a wide variety of source (Kox et al 1987, Fang et al 2000, Zhang et al 2002, Takechi et al 2009) for carbon ions on various materials in the range of 10-790 MeV/u (Hansen 2011). Furthermore, the model of nuclear fragmentation in SHIELD-HIT, called MSDM (multistage dynamical model) (Botvina et al 1997) is adjusted for SHIELD-HIT10A using experimental partial-charge changing cross sections (Golovchenko et al 2002, Toshito et al 2007) for carbon on water, PMMA, paraffin and graphite.…”

Section: Modifications Of the Physical Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%