1968
DOI: 10.1037/h0025488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of primary-process thinking in dream reports.

Abstract: Utilizing material from 500 dreams of 19 Ss, the authors constructed a reliable rating scale for primary-process thinking. The tendency to allow primary process in one's dream reports is a stable trait over a 3-wk. period. This tendency is correlated (r = .60) with the average length of S's dreams. Dreams of the same night are more alike than dreams of different nights. The primaryprocess scale correlates highly (r ~ .84) with a count of the number of different primary-process mechanisms. Finally, the various … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A temporal unit is defined as whatever activities could synchronously occur and are not described as having occurred successively (Foulkes & Schmidt, 1983). We considered density of both size and shape distortions, given that several studies have shown a positive correlation between bizarreness and report length (Antrobus, 1983;Auld et al, 1968;Hunt et al, 1993;McCarley and Hoffman, 1981;Wood, Sebba, & Domino, 1989-1990. Qualitative analysis of bizarreness was conducted on report texts and on an interview that is routinely conducted in the sleep laboratory immediately following free recall, in order to clarify any unclear aspects of images or scenes described in the participants' initial verbalizations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A temporal unit is defined as whatever activities could synchronously occur and are not described as having occurred successively (Foulkes & Schmidt, 1983). We considered density of both size and shape distortions, given that several studies have shown a positive correlation between bizarreness and report length (Antrobus, 1983;Auld et al, 1968;Hunt et al, 1993;McCarley and Hoffman, 1981;Wood, Sebba, & Domino, 1989-1990. Qualitative analysis of bizarreness was conducted on report texts and on an interview that is routinely conducted in the sleep laboratory immediately following free recall, in order to clarify any unclear aspects of images or scenes described in the participants' initial verbalizations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scoring of dreams -A blind judge scored each dream for bizarreness using two scales, Auld's Scale of Primary Process Thinking [24] and a revised version of Kluger's Everydayness Scale [35]. Except for some modifications of the Everydayness scale to improve its psychometric properties, these scales were the same as those used in the studies cited above by Domino [17] and Cann and Donderi [19], and had already demonstrated predicted correlations with waking measures of creativity and intuition.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second problem arises from the fact that, as Antrobus has pointed out [22,23] , measures of dream implausibility and bizarreness typically correlate as highly as .60 with dream report length [24], so that the "bizarre" dreams identified by researchers may simply be "long" ones. The possibility exists, then, that creative people do not really have more bizarre dreams, but merely give longer dream reports.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recently, Holt has published 6 an extensive manual for his "Primary Process System" (PRIPRO-system; Holt, 2007Holt, , 2009) which assesses both content and formal characteristics of primary process but also examines whether manifestations of condensation, displacement, symbolization, contradiction and distortion can be discerned in people"s thinking. Auld, Goldenberg and Weiss (1968) constructed a rating scale fort the scoring of primary process thinking in dreams. Finally, Martindale and Dailey (1996) developed a computerized scoring system (the Regressive Imagery Dictionary) that can be applied in computerized lexical analyses of a variety of text materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%