1980
DOI: 10.1002/art.1780230202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis

Abstract: A structure for representation of patient outcome is presented, together with a method for outcome measurement and validation of the technique in rheumatoid arthritis. The paradigm represents outcome by five separate dimensions: death, discomfort, disability, drug (therapeutic) toxicity, and dollar cost. Each dimension represents an outcome directly related to patient welfare. Quantitation of these outcome dimensions may be performed at interview or by patient questionnaire. With standardized, validated questi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
2,333
5
82

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,886 publications
(2,483 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
8
2,333
5
82
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary end point was the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20 response) (8) at week 14. An ACR20 response was defined as Ն20% improvement in the swollen joint count (66 joints), the tender joint count (68 joints), and at least 3 of the following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of physical function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (9), and the C-reactive protein (CRP) level. ACR50 and ACR70 responses were defined similarly, using Ն50% and Ն70% improvements, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary end point was the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20 response) (8) at week 14. An ACR20 response was defined as Ն20% improvement in the swollen joint count (66 joints), the tender joint count (68 joints), and at least 3 of the following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of physical function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (9), and the C-reactive protein (CRP) level. ACR50 and ACR70 responses were defined similarly, using Ն50% and Ն70% improvements, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major secondary end points assessed at week 24 included superiority comparisons of baricitinib monotherapy or baricitinib plus MTX to MTX monotherapy based on the ACR20 response, Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ DI) 12, 13, Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission (score of ≤3.3) 14, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints 15 based on C‐reactive protein level (DAS28‐CRP) 16, and modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS) 17. Radiographs were scored centrally by 2 independent readers with adjudication by a third reader, if needed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of these post‐hoc analyses, and as validated by Coates and Helliwell 5, MDA was defined as the presence of at least 5 of the following 7 PsA outcome measures: swollen joint count ≤1 of 66 evaluated; tender joint count ≤1 of 68 evaluated; Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤1 (range 0–72)11; patient pain visual analog scale (VAS) score ≤15 (range 0–100); patient global assessment of disease activity VAS score of ≤20 (range 0–100); Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ DI) score ≤0.5 (range 0–3)12, 13; and tender enthesis points ≤1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%