2016
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201611402112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of noise and its correlation to performance and geometry of small aircraft propellers

Abstract: Abstract.A set of small model and UAV propellers is measured both in terms of aerodynamic performance and acoustic noise under static conditions. Apart from obvious correlation of noise to tip speed and propeller diameter the influence of blade pitch, blade pitch distribution, efficiency and shape of the blade is sought. Using the measured performance data a computational model for calculation of aerodynamic noise of propellers will be validated. The range of selected propellers include both propellers designe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, a combination of active and passive mitigation strategies and hearing protection gear (e.g., ear muffs/plugs) have been found to be most feasible. Among these are attempts to tweak propeller dimensions (Molland et al, 2014; Tinney and Sirohi, 2018), propeller geometry (Štorch et al, 2016; Demoret and Wisniewski, 2019), number of propeller blades (Metzger, 1995), or the use of additional propeller ducts (Oleson and Patrick, 1988) and Helmholtz-resonator-based metasurfaces (Zhao et al, 2017) to reduce the generated noise. In the active domain, active noise cancellation (ANC) techniques (Miljković, 2018; Leventhall and Wong, 1988) have been adopted using complex electronic hardware to counter the UAV’s propeller noise output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, a combination of active and passive mitigation strategies and hearing protection gear (e.g., ear muffs/plugs) have been found to be most feasible. Among these are attempts to tweak propeller dimensions (Molland et al, 2014; Tinney and Sirohi, 2018), propeller geometry (Štorch et al, 2016; Demoret and Wisniewski, 2019), number of propeller blades (Metzger, 1995), or the use of additional propeller ducts (Oleson and Patrick, 1988) and Helmholtz-resonator-based metasurfaces (Zhao et al, 2017) to reduce the generated noise. In the active domain, active noise cancellation (ANC) techniques (Miljković, 2018; Leventhall and Wong, 1988) have been adopted using complex electronic hardware to counter the UAV’s propeller noise output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the broadband noise (Figure 10), more challenging to model and control than the BPF tonal noise, has a component that behaves as an acoustic dipole that is related to the vortex shedding at different periodicities on the trailing edge of the blades according to the speed and thickness in each radial position. Another component of the propeller's broadband noise behaves like an acoustic quadrupole and is related to the turbulence produced in the shear layer between the propeller stream tube and the surrounding air (KURTZ; MARTE, 1970;SMITH, 1989;ŠTORCH et al, Figure 9 -Sources of propeller and rotor aerodynamic noise. Source: Adapted from Kurtz and Marte (1970).…”
Section: Propeller Aeroacousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016). Furthermore, conditions such as non-uniformity or inclination of the inflow about the propeller disk are also significant sources of noise (KURTZ; MARTE, 1970;SMITH, 1989;ŠTORCH et al, 2016). The theoretical patterns of directivity (polar distribution of acoustic energy) for each of these noise sources are shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Propeller Aeroacousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations