Measurement of nitrous oxide emissions from fertilized grassland using closed chambers

Abstract

The aims of this study were to use closed chambers to improve estimates of N2O‐N losses from intensively managed grassland on poorly drained soils and to provide measurements for comparison with fluxes determined simultaneously using micrometeorological methods. A 10‐ha field on clay soil in central Scotland received 185 kg NH4NO3‐N ha−1 on April 3, 1992. Twenty‐four closed chambers were installed, six in a 2–3‐ha area grazed by cattle the previous summer, the remainder in an ungrazed area. Fluxes were measured regularly for 3 weeks. Nitrous oxide accumulation in the chambers was determined by gas chromatography. No flux was detected before fertilization. After fertilization, fluxes from the ungrazed and grazed areas were 153±9 and 557±107 g N2O‐N ha−1 d−1, respectively (means and standard errors of all measurements). The individual fluxes ranged from 8 to 712 and 6 to 1519 g N2O‐N ha−1 d−1, respectively, showing marked temporal and spatial variability and lognormal distributions. Fluxes peaked five days after fertilization and were one sixth of their maxima by April 24. Spatial differences observed initially were generally maintained. Incubation of cores with 10% acetylene suggested that the N2O was produced by denitrification in the top 5 cm of soil, and in situ soil N2O measurements confirmed that the concentration was highest close to the surface. In a regression model of the flux from the ungrazed area (including the pre‐ to postfertilization transition), air temperature, recent rainfall, and NO3−‐N could account for 52% of the temporal variability. The higher flux from the grazed area may have resulted from greater local heterogeneity of the surface soil in that area, arising from uneven compaction due to treading by livestock. The total N2O‐N losses (1.7 and 5.1% of applied N from the ungrazed and grazed areas, respectively) confirm that fertilized grassland can contribute substantially to global N2O emissions.

Wheat leaves emit nitrous oxide during nitrate assimilation

“…Some recent micrometeorological N 2 O flux measurements over grass swards failed to detect a higher N 2 O emission rate than that observed by using static chambers over soil alone (39). However, the error in such measurements was too large, with coefficients of variation for the chamber data ranging from 0.42 to 1.83 (40,41), to resolve plant N 2 O emissions of the size measured in this investigation. In support of a role for plant N 2 O emission, Hutchinson and Mosier (42) found that aerodynamic flux measurements over an irrigated corn field were always higher than, although never exceeding twice the mean of, fluxes measured by using soil chambers.…”

Soil compaction impact and modelling. A review

“…These emissions can be much larger in the cultivated fields if N fertilizer is applied in wet conditions (Clayton et al 1994). In fact, in the soils, N 2 O is produced by both the nitrification (aerobic soil conditions) and denitrification (anaerobic soil conditions) and sometimes the nitrification and denitrification can occur simultaneously in the same soil aggregate (Davidson et al 1986).…”

Nitrous oxide emissions from managed grassland: a comparison of eddy covariance and static chamber measurements

“…They provide valuable information comparing different treatments or assessing the spatial variability (e.g. Clayton et al, 1994;Velthof et al, 1996;. However, their coverage is limited over space and time.…”