2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.1945083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Neutron Reaction Cross Sections between 8 and 14 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Particular attention was paid to reproducing the available experimental data for the total cross section and the (n,xn), (n,xp) and (n,xα) channels especially when these lead to radioactive residual nuclei [160]. Figure 27 shows the evaluation compared with data for the 52 C(n,2n) [163-172] and 52 Cr(n,p) [164,169,170,[172][173][174][175][176] reactions and for the production of protons and alphas on natural chromium. The latter are important for the effect of gas production on material damage.…”
Section: Chromiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular attention was paid to reproducing the available experimental data for the total cross section and the (n,xn), (n,xp) and (n,xα) channels especially when these lead to radioactive residual nuclei [160]. Figure 27 shows the evaluation compared with data for the 52 C(n,2n) [163-172] and 52 Cr(n,p) [164,169,170,[172][173][174][175][176] reactions and for the production of protons and alphas on natural chromium. The latter are important for the effect of gas production on material damage.…”
Section: Chromiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cu monitor fulfills these requirements and it seems to be well suited for this application. The disadvantage of 1346 keV γ ray line emitted by 64 Cu (very small self-absorption) is its low emission probability [14]. More threshold detector material was used in order to obtain good counting statistics.…”
Section: Neutron Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by Mannhart and Schmidt[14], weak γ ray counting leads to larger errors. Anyway, the 65 Cu(n, 2n)64 Cu reaction was used in combination with the Bonner-type detector in our case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The cross sections data for 67 Zn(n,p) 67 Cu [6][7][8][9], 64 Zn(n,2n) 63 Zn [1,3,7,[10][11][12][13], 89 Y(n,γ) 90m Y [4,[14][15][16][17], 89 Y(n,2n) 88 Y [5,7,10,[18][19][20][21][22][23] reactions are available around the neutron energy of 14 MeV. However, there is comparably huge disagreement [1,8,9,17] and ambiguity in the experimental data, which is most probably due to various nuclear parameters like half-life, γ-ray abundances, monitor cross section and types of detectors used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%