2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of mood in adolescents with intellectual disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were all rated in their usual setting under a stable environment and working on routine and regular activities. This supports the statement that a person's mood and behaviours, which are the observable emotional states of that individual, are dependent upon the different circumstances and environment he/she encounters (Ross & Oliver 2002; Argus et al . 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Participants were all rated in their usual setting under a stable environment and working on routine and regular activities. This supports the statement that a person's mood and behaviours, which are the observable emotional states of that individual, are dependent upon the different circumstances and environment he/she encounters (Ross & Oliver 2002; Argus et al . 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…1988) have been developed as well. The Intellectual Disability Mood Scale (Argus et al . 2004) is also a reliable and valid measure for the assessment of mood disorders among adolescents with ID.…”
Section: Methods For Measuring Medication Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these limitations may be addressed by avoiding certain types of questions and higher‐order concepts, wording questions as simply as possible and using visual aids to help clarify the response scale. For example, Argus et al . (2004) used a visual analogue of a cup getting more and more full to represent ‘not at all’ to ‘all the time’ on a mood disorder scale for adolescents with ID.…”
Section: Methods For Measuring Medication Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is subjectively experienced and reported by a person and observed by others; examples include depression, elation, or anger. Generally, mood appears to influence the way people perceive, interpret, plan, and execute strategic interpersonal behaviours and thereby influence the kind of social information (3). Mood lability and mixtures of moods are important clinical features that may contribute to diagnostic formulation and treatment response (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%