2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.09.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of J/ψγηc decay rate and η

Abstract: Measurement of J /ψ → γ η c decay rate and η c parameters at KEDR Using the inclusive photon spectrum based on a data sample collected at the J /ψ peak with the KEDR detector at the VEPP-4M e + e − collider, we measured the rate of the radiative decay J /ψ → γ η c as well as η c mass and width. Taking into account an asymmetric photon lineshape we obtained Γ 0 γ ηc = 2.98 ± 0.18 +0.15 −0.33 keV, M ηc = 2983.5 ± 1.4 +1.6 −3.6 MeV/c 2 , Γ ηc = 27.2 ± 3.1 +5.4 −2.6 MeV.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding was soon corroborated by a completely independent simulations made by the HPQCD Collaboration, in which the effects of N f = 2 + 1 staggered light quark flavors were included [11]. Both lattice results implemented the non-perturbative renormalization procedure and, in the continuum limit, exhibited quite a remarkable agreement for Γ(J/ψ → η c γ), also in agreement with the most recent experimental findings [9]. Furthermore, recent improvement of the effective theory approach, based on potential…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our finding was soon corroborated by a completely independent simulations made by the HPQCD Collaboration, in which the effects of N f = 2 + 1 staggered light quark flavors were included [11]. Both lattice results implemented the non-perturbative renormalization procedure and, in the continuum limit, exhibited quite a remarkable agreement for Γ(J/ψ → η c γ), also in agreement with the most recent experimental findings [9]. Furthermore, recent improvement of the effective theory approach, based on potential…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Only in 2009 the CLEO Collaboration [8] was able to provide a new measurement of this decay width and found it to be over 1σ larger than the one measured using the Crystal Ball detector in 1986 [1], but still somewhat smaller than predicted. A very recent measurement at the KEDR experiment confirmed the CLEO result in that Γ(J/ψ → η c γ) is large [9], and reported a value 1.4σ larger than that by CLEO. The charm factory at BESIII is expected to provide a new experimental determination of this decay width and close this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…There are three different determinations from LHCb [34,35,37], two of which also measured the hyperfine splitting. We include a KEDR measurement [33], two from different BABAR analyses [38] and two from BESIII [39,40].…”
Section: Fig 8 Comparison Of Different Experimental Results For Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only three experimental results used in these analyses that can independently produce values for the hyperfine splitting. These are the KEDR experiment [32,33] and two LHCb analyses in different channels [34,35]. The LHCb result in [35] used the η c ð2SÞ → pp decay while the analysis of [34] used η c ð1SÞ → pp.…”
Section: Discussion: Hyperfine Splittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…−0.33 keV at KEDR [79]. As a whole, strong model dependence exists in the predictions of the M1 transitions, more studies are needed in both theory and experiments.…”
Section: Lighter Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%