2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.88.092301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement ofGEp/GMp

Abstract: The ratio of the electric and magnetic form factors of the proton G(E(p))/G(M(p)), which is an image of its charge and magnetization distributions, was measured at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab) using the recoil polarization technique. The ratio of the form factors is directly proportional to the ratio of the transverse to longitudinal components of the polarization of the recoil proton in the elastic e(-->)p---> e(-->)p reaction. The new data presented span the range 3.5< Q(2)< 5.6 … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
351
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 623 publications
(372 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
18
351
3
Order By: Relevance
“…=P k is proportional to G E ðQ 2 Þ=G M ðQ 2 Þ [8,9]. A series of such experiments [7,[10][11][12][13] (6), and since the proton's magnetic form factor is reliably known on a spacelike domain that extends to Q 2 % 30 GeV 2 [14,15], the evolution of this ratio exposes novel features of the proton's charge distribution, as expressed in G E ðQ 2 Þ. An explanation of the discrepancy between the Rosenbluth and polarization transfer results for the ratio is currently judged to lie in two-photon-exchange corrections to the Born approximation, which affect the polarization transfer extraction of G E ðQ 2 Þ=G M ðQ 2 Þ far less than they do the ratio inferred via Rosenbluth separation [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…=P k is proportional to G E ðQ 2 Þ=G M ðQ 2 Þ [8,9]. A series of such experiments [7,[10][11][12][13] (6), and since the proton's magnetic form factor is reliably known on a spacelike domain that extends to Q 2 % 30 GeV 2 [14,15], the evolution of this ratio exposes novel features of the proton's charge distribution, as expressed in G E ðQ 2 Þ. An explanation of the discrepancy between the Rosenbluth and polarization transfer results for the ratio is currently judged to lie in two-photon-exchange corrections to the Born approximation, which affect the polarization transfer extraction of G E ðQ 2 Þ=G M ðQ 2 Þ far less than they do the ratio inferred via Rosenbluth separation [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that the charge and the magnetization distribution inside the proton are similar. In contrast, the results from recent polarization transfer measurements [12,13,14,15], using a polarized electron beam to measure the polarization of the recoil proton shows an approximately linear drop of the ratio from unity with increasing Q 2 . The results from both techniques are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…A number of recent experiments at Jefferson Lab and MIT-Bates [12,13,14,15,27,28] have measured the proton form factor ratio R up to Q 2 = 8. …”
Section: Polarization Transfer (Pt) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations