2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2013.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of maximum stable drop size in aerated dilute liquid–liquid dispersions in stirred tanks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum stable particle diameter is the minimum particle diameter that resists breaking further in turbulent flow field. In liquid–liquid dispersions the existence of a maximum stable drop size is generally accepted . Particles smaller than a critical size, namely dmax, can be resisted the flow field without undergoing breakage, but the larger ones are unstable and eventually break up.…”
Section: Breakup Modeling—literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum stable particle diameter is the minimum particle diameter that resists breaking further in turbulent flow field. In liquid–liquid dispersions the existence of a maximum stable drop size is generally accepted . Particles smaller than a critical size, namely dmax, can be resisted the flow field without undergoing breakage, but the larger ones are unstable and eventually break up.…”
Section: Breakup Modeling—literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum stable drop sizes measured were essentially constant during this time span in all reactors. Examples for this were shown in Daub et al [ 25 ]. Extending the experimental time to up to 9 h yielded a further decrease of the maximum stable drop size in the range of 10% compared to the value at 3 h dispersion time in the 3 m 3 reactor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Very small drops in the range < 50 μm are also present that might be daughter drops that developed during break up of larger drops and did not coalesce to larger droplets any more. These small droplets are not relevant for the subject of this work as described in [ 9 ] and [ 25 ]. Table 3 compares characteristic values for the main peaks of the distributions that were calculated from the fitted normal distributions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations