2019
DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Maternal Mindful Awareness of Fetal Movement

Abstract: Introduction:Decreased fetal movement is a common concern late in pregnancy that may be associated with increased fetal morbidity and mortality. Limited research suggests a relationship between maternal psychological factors and perception of fetal movement. The goal of this study was to test the reliability and external validity of a novel self-report instrument for maternal mindful awareness of fetal movement.Methods: Pregnant women who were at 20 weeks' gestation or later and feeling regular fetal movement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the presence of false recognition by the system may be caused by pregnant women’s random limb movement during the measurement process, which generates artifact signals with high similarity to the time-frequency characteristics of fetal movement signals. The active perception of pregnant women self-counting fetal movements has no effect on pregnant women or fetuses ( 27 , 28 ), but the method is susceptible to many factors such as the surrounding environment and personal emotions ( 29–31 ), and the short-term detection data is highly reliable. At the same time, some weak fetal movement signals may not be fully captured by the acceleration sensor mounted on the pregnant woman’s abdomen, resulting in a low real detection recognition rate.…”
Section: Testing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the presence of false recognition by the system may be caused by pregnant women’s random limb movement during the measurement process, which generates artifact signals with high similarity to the time-frequency characteristics of fetal movement signals. The active perception of pregnant women self-counting fetal movements has no effect on pregnant women or fetuses ( 27 , 28 ), but the method is susceptible to many factors such as the surrounding environment and personal emotions ( 29–31 ), and the short-term detection data is highly reliable. At the same time, some weak fetal movement signals may not be fully captured by the acceleration sensor mounted on the pregnant woman’s abdomen, resulting in a low real detection recognition rate.…”
Section: Testing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%