2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2008.05.196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of magnetic properties of Ni-alloy substrate of HTS coated conductor in LN2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
28
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
28
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore we used a modified value of Q s = 200 J m −3 in all the following calculations. The same value was used for a similar tape by Miyagi et al [23]. The results for a parallel magnetic field are presented in figure 9.…”
Section: Ac Loss Of CC Tape On Magnetic Substratementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore we used a modified value of Q s = 200 J m −3 in all the following calculations. The same value was used for a similar tape by Miyagi et al [23]. The results for a parallel magnetic field are presented in figure 9.…”
Section: Ac Loss Of CC Tape On Magnetic Substratementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Claassen [26] has used a constant value of μ r = 100. The permeability of weakly ferromagnetic substrates has been measured [23], which has a parabolic dependence on the magnetic field, giving a maximum value of μ r = 200 at B a = 100 mT. The relative permeability of the substrate is therefore assumed to be μ r = 200 in this paper.…”
Section: Weakly Ferromagnetic Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the J c distribution that is non uniform and anisotropic, the measured field distribution is not as symmetric as the calculated one. Note that the calculation assumes a relative permeability of the 75 µm Nickel substrate as 2 according to an extrapolation of Nickel permeability measurements in [5] and [6] in order to roughly consider its effect on trapped field distribution. In a trapped field of the real NMR system, > 2.35 T, the Nickel substrates will be fully saturated.…”
Section: Field Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%