Measurement of knee arthro-kinematic patterns in young individuals with back knee gait

Wu, Ritu; Huang, YT; Chiang, Wei-Hsuan; Chen, W.-Y.

doi:10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.062

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They reported highly accurate results but only measured static movement [24]. Wu et al utilized the VICON 3D motion system to examine tibial angle, velocity, speed, and linear movement on the femur [25]. They measured dynamic arthrokinematic motion in walking mode but failed to report the accuracy of their measurements.…”

Section: Tools Measuring Dynamic Knee Arthrokinematic Movementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Indistinctive VICON 3D motion system Wu et al [25] The overall dimensions of the system were 7.2 m 4.0 m 1.9 m (length width height) with the walkway measuring 7.2 m 2.0 m (length width). Each X-ray unit comprised of an X-ray tube and an image intensifier, which were mounted on a robotic arm that was translated along with the vertical guide of a mobile column.…”

Section: /11mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition to tibial transitional motions relative to the femur, arthrokinematic rotational movements were also measured [19,20], but the disadvantages of these methods are that they evaluate arthrokinematics in a static state, while all arthrokinematic movements are performed in a functional and dynamic state. Over time, VICON 3D motion system and fluoroscopy instruments were developed to measure knee arthrokinematics, which is an advantage over the static method [20,25]. These tools are evaluated by a dynamic and functional arthrokinematic method, and the data obtained from these tools are more reliable.…”

Section: Tools Measuring Qualitative Knee Arthrokinematicmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Assessment Methods of Knee Joint Arthrokinematics: A Review of Literature

Norasteh

Zarei

2021

J. Res. Orthop. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context: The present study provides an analysis of methods in assessment and measurement of knee arthrokinematic movements. Evidence Acquisition: in this study, an exhaustive review of the methods for assessment of knee joint arthrokinematics is provided. For this, some known databases including Science Direct, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Google Scholar, for the period 1985 to February 2020 are explored. Results: After the assessment steps, 14 articles were chosen based on the criteria and objectives of the research; 13 articles in entirety and one as a summary. Through a review of the studies, it was observed that various methods were used in assessment and measurement of the knee joint arthrokinematic movements. In the beginning, focus was on transitional motion in which knee arthrokinematic movements were studied in static state; but with time, knee transitional movement was studied in dynamic state as well. More recent studies scrutinized three main types of arthrokinematics: motion rolling, gliding and spinning. There were also studies that tried to implement tools which required minimum cost and scrutinized the knee arthrokinematic movements without complicated state-of-the-art equipment. All the said equipment were designed with the aim of diagnosis of how the arthrokinematic movements of an injured knee compared to a healthy one. Conclusion: Results of our analysis show that the literature is rich with a variety of instruments for measuring knee arthrokinematic movements. By classifying the instruments, it was found that studies of four different measurement methods including static, dynamic, functional and qualitative have examined the arthrokinematic movements of the knee.

show abstract

Section: Tools Measuring Dynamic Knee Arthrokinematic Movementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: /11mentioning

confidence: 99%