2000
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.37.740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of keV-Neutron Capture Cross Sections and Capture Gamma-Ray Spectra of 140Ce and 141Pr.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data by Voss et al 14) are in good agreement with the measurement. Very recently, the data by Harnood et al 15) are in better agreement with the current result in the energy region from 12 to 70 keV. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data by Voss et al 14) are in good agreement with the measurement. Very recently, the data by Harnood et al 15) are in better agreement with the current result in the energy region from 12 to 70 keV. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The data reported are listed in Table 1. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Konks et al 8) measured the cross section at energies from 22 eV to 40 keV with a lead slowingdown spectrometer, which gave poor energy resolution of about 30 to 35% at full-width at half-maximum (FWHM). Gibbons et al 9) obtained the data in the energy range of 7 to 170 keV using a Van de Graaff accelerator and a liquid scintillation tank detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The multiplicities of 209 Bi are much smaller than those of lanthanoids. [18][19][20][21] Moreover, the reduced multiplicities are not constant, i.e. depending on the incident neutron energies, in contrast to those of lanthanoids.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representative example is the anomalous bump shown in the experiments of the capture gamma-ray spectra. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] According to a theoretical analysis and experiments, the bump could be considered to have the electric or magnetic properties of decaying gamma similar to the giant electric or magnetic resonances. So far, the bump has not been regarded as an essential nuclear property because it does not…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%