2018
DOI: 10.20944/preprints201804.0349.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Immature Granulocytes (IG) Percentage to Assess Severe Bacterial Infection in Latvian Children: A Secondary Data Analysis

Abstract: Background: Detection of small proportion of serious bacterial infections (SBI) with

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By ROC analysis, the sensitivity of IG to detect serious bacterial infection was determined as 66% and its specificity as 84%. 21 In our study, which analyzed the IG values of pediatric patients with sepsis, the results were consistent with the literature in terms of 46% sensitivity and 80% specificity in the diagnosis of sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By ROC analysis, the sensitivity of IG to detect serious bacterial infection was determined as 66% and its specificity as 84%. 21 In our study, which analyzed the IG values of pediatric patients with sepsis, the results were consistent with the literature in terms of 46% sensitivity and 80% specificity in the diagnosis of sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In a study among pediatric patients admitted to the emergency room as a result of fever, IG levels, WBC, and CRP were found to be statistically significantly higher in patients with severe bacterial infection than in patients with non‐bacterial infection. By ROC analysis, the sensitivity of IG to detect serious bacterial infection was determined as 66% and its specificity as 84% 21 . In our study, which analyzed the IG values of pediatric patients with sepsis, the results were consistent with the literature in terms of 46% sensitivity and 80% specificity in the diagnosis of sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%