1972
DOI: 10.1029/rs007i004p00469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of E‐Layer Effective Recombination Coefficient During Solar Flares

Abstract: Simultaneous measurements of flare-enhanced electron density in the E layer and of flareenhanced solar X-ray flux were used to evaluate the ionospheric relaxation time constant at Elayer heights. The method is an extension of Appleton's ionospheric "filter" idea to the case in which radiation flux and electron density fluctuations are simultaneously measured. Electron density measurements were made using the Thomson scatter technique at the National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center, Arecibo, Puerto Rico. X-ray … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of f increases as we establish its relationship to the several parameters mentioned. The two data points at 94 and 100 km were obtained byWagner and Thome [1972] using solar flare X ray intensities measured by satellite in conjunction with electron density measurements obtained with the Arecibo incoherent scatter radar. The spread in the values of f at a given altitude reflects real dependences on such parameters as production rate and solar zenith angle, as we shall see later, in addition to inaccuracies introduced by spatial and temporal variations in the auroral fluxes and variations in the radar parameters.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The importance of f increases as we establish its relationship to the several parameters mentioned. The two data points at 94 and 100 km were obtained byWagner and Thome [1972] using solar flare X ray intensities measured by satellite in conjunction with electron density measurements obtained with the Arecibo incoherent scatter radar. The spread in the values of f at a given altitude reflects real dependences on such parameters as production rate and solar zenith angle, as we shall see later, in addition to inaccuracies introduced by spatial and temporal variations in the auroral fluxes and variations in the radar parameters.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Whitten et al (1965); Parthasarathy and Rai (1965); Gledhill (1986) have developed theoretical methods for empirical expressions for α ef f (it includes α i , α D , λ and other dust capture coefficients of aerosol theory). Wagner and Thome (1972) proposed a different method namely 'Thomson Scatter Experimental Technique' to simulate electron density and α ef f during solar flares relative to pre-flare condition at E-region. According to Appleton (1953), the N e and α ef f are directly related to time delay △t.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the effective recombination coefficient is influenced by the ionic composition, the state of excitation, the temperature of the ionosphere, and the electron density. As indicated by several authors, α is usually 1-3 10 -7 cm 3 /seg for the E layer (Wagner and Thome, 1972;Bates, 1988). Thus, according to the observed delays (almost 1,030 s), assuming that a noticeable effect (80% perturbation) becomes evident at 1.6 τ. Supposing α 1.5 10 -7 cm 3 /seg, it yields an N value of 1.1 10 4 /cm 3 , which is not an unexpected value.…”
Section: Geomagnetic Field Variationmentioning
confidence: 57%