2016
DOI: 10.9790/4861-0804029299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement Of Gross Alpha And Beta Radioacivity In Ground Water From Some Bore Holes And Wells In Kaduna North Local Government Area Of Kaduna State.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement technology of gross alpha and beta in drinking water includes the evaporation concentration method, the co-precipitation method, and real-time monitoring. The evaporation concentration method usually takes a 0.1-2.0 L sample as total dissolved solid, and the sample is evaporated slowly to complete dryness, then the gross alpha and beta radioactivity levels can be calculated by measuring those of the solid residues [6.7] , and the detector can be a proportional counter [8,9] or scintillator detector [10,11] . This method has the advantages of the reliable measurement results and lower detection limit, but the sampling period is long and the sample process is complex, making it rather inefficient, especially in the case of an alert for unexpected radioactive events [12,13] , and this method does not allow for the determination of volatile radionuclides, making the results underestimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement technology of gross alpha and beta in drinking water includes the evaporation concentration method, the co-precipitation method, and real-time monitoring. The evaporation concentration method usually takes a 0.1-2.0 L sample as total dissolved solid, and the sample is evaporated slowly to complete dryness, then the gross alpha and beta radioactivity levels can be calculated by measuring those of the solid residues [6.7] , and the detector can be a proportional counter [8,9] or scintillator detector [10,11] . This method has the advantages of the reliable measurement results and lower detection limit, but the sampling period is long and the sample process is complex, making it rather inefficient, especially in the case of an alert for unexpected radioactive events [12,13] , and this method does not allow for the determination of volatile radionuclides, making the results underestimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%