2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(03)00181-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of glenoid version: conventional radiographs versus computed tomography scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
152
1
15

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
152
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate measurement of glenoid parameters is challenging, and thus of great interest in clinical research [7]. The first studies which focus on intra-and inter-reliability have shown unsatisfactory precision of measurement of radiographic parameters used to quantify a glenoid retroversion [9,10]. The low reproducibility of X-ray evaluation results from great variation in scapular positioning, which affects identification of homological points on this bone [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate measurement of glenoid parameters is challenging, and thus of great interest in clinical research [7]. The first studies which focus on intra-and inter-reliability have shown unsatisfactory precision of measurement of radiographic parameters used to quantify a glenoid retroversion [9,10]. The low reproducibility of X-ray evaluation results from great variation in scapular positioning, which affects identification of homological points on this bone [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study represents a key first step in expanding our preoperative evaluation of patients with shoulder arthritis. Previously, authors have evaluated primarily the bone quality and morphometry on plain radiographs and CT scans to assess the feasibility of shoulder replacement [4][5][6]. With this study and likely others to follow, perhaps orthopaedic surgeons might consider CT scans or MRI evaluation of the rotator cuff musculature in order to help predict outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty.…”
Section: Where Do We Need To Go?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies have supported the role of 2D CT imaging for preoperative planning in total shoulder arthroplasty [17][18][19][20][21][22]. 3D CT imaging has been shown to offer superior accuracy over 2D CT imaging for determining the location of glenoid bone loss and guiding surgical decision-making [23, 24•, 25].…”
Section: Preoperative Planning and Intraoperative Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%