2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(03)00181-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of glenoid version: conventional radiographs versus computed tomography scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
146
1
15

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
146
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…This study represents a key first step in expanding our preoperative evaluation of patients with shoulder arthritis. Previously, authors have evaluated primarily the bone quality and morphometry on plain radiographs and CT scans to assess the feasibility of shoulder replacement [4][5][6]. With this study and likely others to follow, perhaps orthopaedic surgeons might consider CT scans or MRI evaluation of the rotator cuff musculature in order to help predict outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty.…”
Section: Where Do We Need To Go?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study represents a key first step in expanding our preoperative evaluation of patients with shoulder arthritis. Previously, authors have evaluated primarily the bone quality and morphometry on plain radiographs and CT scans to assess the feasibility of shoulder replacement [4][5][6]. With this study and likely others to follow, perhaps orthopaedic surgeons might consider CT scans or MRI evaluation of the rotator cuff musculature in order to help predict outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty.…”
Section: Where Do We Need To Go?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies have supported the role of 2D CT imaging for preoperative planning in total shoulder arthroplasty [17][18][19][20][21][22]. 3D CT imaging has been shown to offer superior accuracy over 2D CT imaging for determining the location of glenoid bone loss and guiding surgical decision-making [23, 24•, 25].…”
Section: Preoperative Planning and Intraoperative Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ó ýòîé ãðóïïû ïàöèåíòîâ ìû èçó÷àëè ñâîéñòâà ãëåíîèäà ëîïàòêè, èç-ìåíåíèå êîòîðûõ ñïîñîáíî ïîâëèÿòü íà ñòàáèëüíîñòü ïëå÷åâîãî ñóñòàâà, à èìåííî ðàçìåðû ãëåíîèäà (âûñî-òà, øèðèíà, ïëîùàäü), ïîâîðîò (àíòåâåðñèÿ, ðåòðîâåð-ñèÿ) è óãîë íàêëîíà [60]. Çà îñíîâó èçó÷åíèÿ âûøå-óêàçàííûõ ïðèçíàêîâ áûëè âçÿòû ñòàòèñòè÷åñêèå äàí-íûå ïàðàìåòðîâ ãëåíîèäà ëîïàòêè ÷åëîâåêà, ãäå ñðåäíÿÿ âûñîòà ãëåíîèäà (glenoid height) íà îñíîâàíèè ðàçëè÷íûõ èññëåäîâàíèé [61] 2 -ó aeåíùèí [62]. Ïîâîðîò ãëåíîèäà (glenoid version) -óãîë ìåaeäó ïîâåðõíîñòüþ ãëåíîèäà è òåëîì ëîïàòêè -ìîaeåò áûòü ïåðåäíèì (àíòåâåðñèÿ) è çàäíèì (ðåòðîâåðñèÿ).…”
Section: ðèñ 5 ïàöèåíò ï ñ âîññòàíîâëåííûì ñóñòàâíûì îòðîñòêîì ëîïunclassified