1982
DOI: 10.1378/chest.81.1.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Functional Residual Capacity During Mechanical Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Its accuracy was assessed by scanning large reservoirs containing a soapy emulsion obtained from known volumes of water, soap, and air. To date, FRC has been measured mainly in ARDS by nitrogen [28] or sulfur hexafluoride washout [9,29] and open and closed circuit helium dilution techniques [28,30]. These methods have the advantage of being noninvasive and thus allowing repeated bedside measurements.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its accuracy was assessed by scanning large reservoirs containing a soapy emulsion obtained from known volumes of water, soap, and air. To date, FRC has been measured mainly in ARDS by nitrogen [28] or sulfur hexafluoride washout [9,29] and open and closed circuit helium dilution techniques [28,30]. These methods have the advantage of being noninvasive and thus allowing repeated bedside measurements.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AM Loss of aerated lung volume is a characteristic feature of acute lung injury (ALI) and is commonly observed after major thoracic and abdominal surgical procedures. Reduction in lung volume is generally assessed by measuring FRC, using gas dilution techniques such as nitrogen (1) or sulfur hexafluoride (2,3) washout and open-and closed-circuit helium dilution techniques (1,4). These methods have the advantage of being noninvasive, allowing bedside and repeated measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have the advantage of being noninvasive, allowing bedside and repeated measurements. However, they are not always reproducible (1,2,5) and do not provide any measurement of the volume of nonaerated lung. Furthermore, there are some important limitations common to all these techniques when applied to patients with ALI: ( 1 ) the diseased lung is characterized by the presence of poorly aerated areas where the gas mixing is problematic, ( 2 ) distention of previously aerated regions cannot be distinguished from true alveolar recruitment when FRC increases after positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and ( 3 ) regional distribution of aerated and nonaerated lung volumes and of PEEPinduced alveolar recruitment cannot be assessed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dilution techniques give lower values than plethysmography and cannot be performed without modification of ventilator or the breathing circuit. In addition, during measurement with the dilution technique the breathing pattern is substantially changed and a negative pressure has to be applied [10,22]. Respiratory inductive plethysmography can only be used to measure the change of the FRC values [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%