2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Foveal Avascular Zone Dimensions and its Reliability in Healthy Eyes Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

21
133
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
21
133
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We assessed FAZ size by marking the border of vessels from OCTA images using ImageJ software, as previously validated. 12,13,24,[30][31][32] Although excellent reproducibility was observed in this study and has been reported in previous studies, 12,13,24 it is possible that measurement error or interrater variability may exist and act as a confounding variable. While we corrected the ocular magnification effect from different ALs in the measurement of FAZ size using Littmann's formula, the use of OCTA-derived VD measurements remains a possible source of error in our correlation analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assessed FAZ size by marking the border of vessels from OCTA images using ImageJ software, as previously validated. 12,13,24,[30][31][32] Although excellent reproducibility was observed in this study and has been reported in previous studies, 12,13,24 it is possible that measurement error or interrater variability may exist and act as a confounding variable. While we corrected the ocular magnification effect from different ALs in the measurement of FAZ size using Littmann's formula, the use of OCTA-derived VD measurements remains a possible source of error in our correlation analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Measurements of the FAZ area and perimeter have been described in detail elsewhere. 12,13,24,[30][31][32] Briefly, two independent raters performed FAZ measurements twice while masked to each other's results, as well as to the clinical information for each participant, including the presence of glaucoma and location of VF defect. Macular OCTA images were loaded into an image analysis program (ImageJ 1.51, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/; provided in the public domain by the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).…”
Section: Octa Image Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less but still satisfactory reliability was disclosed also for 12 3 12-mm angiocube at the same plexuses besides diabetic subgroup at all retina. As reported by other studies, 12 the interrater reliability was not as good for deep vascular plexus. Interestingly, good results were seen in the 3 3 3-mm scan, but not in the others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Macular quantitative parameters vary across different instruments and techniques (i.e., manual versus automatic assessment); however, several studies demonstrated that they have a good inter-and intraoperator reliability in case of same machine, acquisition and postprocessing protocols. [7][8][9]11,12,23 Measurement at the superficial plexus is highly reliable, while manual demarcation at the deep plexus may be not easy due to less definite contours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual measurement of FAZ area based on OCTA images at the superficial vascular network is a noninvasive, simple, and useful method for quantifying FAZ dimensions and architecture. [12][13][14][15][16][17] Clinical elements affecting FAZ area may include age, diabetic retinopathy (DR), and retinal vascular occlusive diseases.12,18-22 Foveal avascular zone circularity (roundness of the FAZ border) can also help characterize FAZ architecture, which can be reduced by vascular diseases in the macula, such as DR or retinal vein occlusion (RVO). 12,13,15,[17][18][19] Patients with microcirculatory deficiency involving the macula have been shown to have selective alteration in the FAZ area and circularity in the perifoveal region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%