2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.12.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of forward photon production cross-section in proton–proton collisions at s=13TeV with the LHCf detector

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distributions are expressed in terms of the inclusive differential production cross section dσ n /dE, which was corrected for the limited coverage of the azimuthal angle. In the comparison with generators, for each model we used its own inelastic cross section, as reported in reference [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Distributions are expressed in terms of the inclusive differential production cross section dσ n /dE, which was corrected for the limited coverage of the azimuthal angle. In the comparison with generators, for each model we used its own inelastic cross section, as reported in reference [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second comes from different hardware effects present during data taking at the LHC (2.0%), like ADCs non-linearity, cables attenuation, high voltages stability, PMTs gain calibration. The third is related to the observed shift in the position of the π 0 mass peak with respect to the simulations (+1.6%), as reconstructed from the two gamma invariant mass distribution [25]. Despite the fact that this shift is well within the consistency bounds of the two previously mentioned systematic uncertainties, we decided to consider this contribution as an additional source of error in our analysis.…”
Section: Jhep11(2018)073mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Finally, hadron simulations are required to estimate the sensitivity of future gamma-ray observatories, such as the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) [13], the Southern Gamma-ray Survey Observatory (SGSO) [14], and the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) [15] which could be affected by the choice of models. The advent of LHC measurements has provided large amounts of data at never before probed energies [16] and at extreme rapidities [17,18]. This data glut promises improvements to hadronic interaction models by facilitating model tuning in energy ranges not before possible and has resulted in the creation of a new generation of air shower focused hadronic interaction models [19][20][21] tuned to this data set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data relative to p-p collisions at √ s = 13 TeV was acquired by the LHCf experiment during Fill 3855, a low luminosity and high β * fill. Using this data set, the collaboration published two analyses relative to photons [6] and neutrons [7] production in the forward region.…”
Section: Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%