1982
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446(1982)007<0005:mofsab>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Fish Scales and Back Calculation of Body Lengths Using a Digitizing Pad and Microcomputer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Annuli were distinguished and counted to determine age. Growth rates of the Two Island Lake and Cloud Lake captured fish were determined by back-calculation using the DISBCAL program, an Apple I1 microcomputer, and a digitizing pad (Frie 1982).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annuli were distinguished and counted to determine age. Growth rates of the Two Island Lake and Cloud Lake captured fish were determined by back-calculation using the DISBCAL program, an Apple I1 microcomputer, and a digitizing pad (Frie 1982).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One pectoral spine was collected from each bullhead for age determinations. Ages of each bass and carp were determined through techniques described by Frie (1982). Ages of bullhead were determined by techniques described in Blouin and Hall (1990).…”
Section: Fish Sampling and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we chose the non-lethal assessment of age from scales. Mean backcalculated length at age and standard error were calculated using DISBCAL software (Frie 1982) assuming a direct proportion between body length and scale length. Mean backcalculated length at age was interpreted from scale impressions under the assumption that the Y-intercept (a) value for the body length-scale length relationship was 35 mm, as suggested by Carlander (1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%