1991
DOI: 10.1016/0141-5425(91)90062-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of finger joint angles and maximum finger forces during cylinder grip activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
57
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
12
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In such an action, the fingers act in parallel and the forces acting on the object are easier to measure and quantify (Kinoshita et al 1995, 1996a, Santello and Soechting 2000, Rearick and Santello 2002, Shim et al 2003,b, 2005a. While several previous studies have addressed the manipulation of circular objects (Amis 1987, Lee and Rim 1991, Radhakrishnan and Nagaravindra 1993, Kinoshita et al 1996b, Shih and Wang 1997, Fowler and Nicol 1999, they mainly focused on the resultant force/moment (Fowler andNicol 1999, Voorbij andSteenbekkers 2002), single-digit force exerted on the object (Fowler and Nicol 1999) or the force production without a twisting action (Kinoshita et al 1996b). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such an action, the fingers act in parallel and the forces acting on the object are easier to measure and quantify (Kinoshita et al 1995, 1996a, Santello and Soechting 2000, Rearick and Santello 2002, Shim et al 2003,b, 2005a. While several previous studies have addressed the manipulation of circular objects (Amis 1987, Lee and Rim 1991, Radhakrishnan and Nagaravindra 1993, Kinoshita et al 1996b, Shih and Wang 1997, Fowler and Nicol 1999, they mainly focused on the resultant force/moment (Fowler andNicol 1999, Voorbij andSteenbekkers 2002), single-digit force exerted on the object (Fowler and Nicol 1999) or the force production without a twisting action (Kinoshita et al 1996b). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] Many of these techniques do not allow for the simultaneous measurement of all DoFs or do not use the PJRAs to express the angles. Furthermore, it is usually desirable that the measuring technique does not interfere with the normal development of the hand activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this point of view, the optimal method is image processing, but such measurements require complex equipment and high computing capacity for the post-processing. Literature sources often do not provide details on the measurement device applied and its possible effects on the natural motion of finger joints [9], [12], [16], [20]. Furthermore, publications addressing the accuracy of joint motion measurements [3], [4], [5], [11], [15] do not provide detailed information on the quantitative analysis of the motion of metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal articulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%