2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-020-01219-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Feminist Identity and Attitudes Over the Past Half Century: A Critical Review and Call for Further Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Siegel and Calogero (2021) have recently noted, the measurement of feminist beliefs, identity, and attitudes has been inconsistent and warrants further research exploration. Self-identifying as a feminist is associated with more self-efficacy and body satisfaction, as well as more interest in participating in feminist activism (Borowsky et al, 2016; Eisele & Stake, 2008; Murnen & Smolak, 2009; Yoder et al, 2011).…”
Section: A Feminist Approach To Body Talkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Siegel and Calogero (2021) have recently noted, the measurement of feminist beliefs, identity, and attitudes has been inconsistent and warrants further research exploration. Self-identifying as a feminist is associated with more self-efficacy and body satisfaction, as well as more interest in participating in feminist activism (Borowsky et al, 2016; Eisele & Stake, 2008; Murnen & Smolak, 2009; Yoder et al, 2011).…”
Section: A Feminist Approach To Body Talkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, national and international reports indicate that more people than ever feel comfortable using the term “feminist” to describe themselves (see Siegel, 2020). Empirical research on feminist identity has proliferated over the past several decades; yet most of this scholarship has focused exclusively on women’s feminist attitudes and identification (see Siegel & Calogero, 2021). This is unsurprising, given that women are more likely than men to recognize, experience, and protest against sexism (Becker & Swim, 2012; Radke et al, 2018; Swim et al, 2001).…”
Section: Feminist Stigma and Stereotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary distinction between the FID and the WID models is the population of women that the model is theorized to reflect. The FID model describes a multistage developmental process that feminists experience as they move toward adopting a feminist identity, though it has been criticized for neglecting the experiences of women of color and its mixed relevance for women today (Erchull et al, 2009; Siegel & Calogero, 2021). The WID specifically focuses on the unique everyday experiences of Black women and the process of developing a confident and self-assured sense of self, rather than active participation as a member of a politicized social movement.…”
Section: Feminist Stigma and Stereotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, women's identification with feminism was high across studies and did not vary significantly across conditions, even when collective-action intentions were significantly lower in the resilience conditions (see Supplementary Materials for full analyses). More research is needed to examine evidence for and implications of this neoliberal feminist shift, whereby feminism is understood as an individual self-project, not one that necessarily involves women and others coming together to challenge external systems of oppression (for related theory and research, see Becker et al, 2015;Siegel & Calogero, 2021).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%