“…The LDF assessment of PBF may be highly susceptible to environmental and technique-related factors. Variables such as probe design (Ingólfsson et al 1993, Hartmann et al 1996, probe holder characteristics , Wilder-Smith 1988, Ramsay et al 1991b, McDonald & Pitt Ford 1994, Hartmann et al 1996, Musselwhite et al 1997, gingival isolation devices (Hartmann et al 1996, Vongsavan & Matthews 1996, Soo-ampon et al 2003, 2005b, flowmeter characteristics (Ingólfsson et al 1994b, Hartmann et al 1996, Odor et al 1996a,c, Roebuck et al 2000, mineralization of enamel and dentine (Vaarkamp et al 1995), the temperature of the environment, the position and the resting status of the patient, the position of the probe (Edwall et al 1987, Shimazaki et al 1989, Oberg 1990, Ramsay et al 1991b, Ingólfsson et al 1994b, Hartmann et al 1996, Odor et al 1996b), heartbeat-synchronous oscillations, tooth discolouration, stress, intake of drugs, agerelated changes, etc, may significantly influence LDF results (Okabe et al 1989, Olgart et al 1989, Heithersay & Hirsch 1993, Matthews & Vongsavan 1993, Chng et al 1996, Musselwhite et al 1997, Verdickt & Abbott 2001, Ikawa et al 2003. These factors can be categorized as below.…”