2022
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6471/aca1d7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of excitation functions for nat Cu(α, x) reactions with detailed covariance analysis

Abstract: The excitation functions of $^{66}$Ga, $^{67}$Ga, $^{65}$Zn and $^{64}$Cu radioisotopes produced via alpha-induced reaction on $^{nat}$Cu were measured using a stacked-foil activation method. The gamma-ray activity produced by the above-mentioned radionuclides was measured using the HPGe detector. The covariance analysis was performed to quantify the measured cross-section uncertainties as well as the correlation between different alpha energy cross sections. A covariance matrix and cross-sections for the $^{n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of a single crystal p-type HPGe detector was calibrated at various characteristic γ-ray energies using a standard 152 Eu point source (T 1/2 = 13.517 ± 0.009 y) of known activity (A 0 = 6614.71 ± 81.33 Bq as of 1 October 1999). The efficiency of the detector for the point source geometry was evaluated using the following equation given in [26,27] ( ) e = There are various sources of uncertainty in the calibration process, which generates uncertainty in the detectors efficiency. These uncertainties are from C, I, A 0 , and λ parameters respectively.…”
Section: Covariance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of a single crystal p-type HPGe detector was calibrated at various characteristic γ-ray energies using a standard 152 Eu point source (T 1/2 = 13.517 ± 0.009 y) of known activity (A 0 = 6614.71 ± 81.33 Bq as of 1 October 1999). The efficiency of the detector for the point source geometry was evaluated using the following equation given in [26,27] ( ) e = There are various sources of uncertainty in the calibration process, which generates uncertainty in the detectors efficiency. These uncertainties are from C, I, A 0 , and λ parameters respectively.…”
Section: Covariance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%