2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of evapotranspiration during sprinkler irrigation using a precision energy budget (Bowen ratio, eddy covariance) methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, ET is obtained based on ground experiment or observation, such as the energy budget (Bowen Ratio, the eddy covariance) method [7,9,10]. Second, some models are used to estimate ET such as the Two-Source Energy Balance Model or the CROPWAT model [7,8,[10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, ET is obtained based on ground experiment or observation, such as the energy budget (Bowen Ratio, the eddy covariance) method [7,9,10]. Second, some models are used to estimate ET such as the Two-Source Energy Balance Model or the CROPWAT model [7,8,[10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Types of irrigation commonly used are; surface irrigation, sprinkler irrigation and drip irrigation (Hanson, 2005). Sprinkler irrigation is becoming a preferred method when the available water for irrigation becomes scarce (Uddin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All days show firstly that there is a substantial imbalance in the energy budget between available energy (R n + D H ), and the ECV-measured flux ( E + H) plus D V . Given that the lesser terms in the energy balance equation were either negligible or effectively cancelled one-another out, and that the ECV footprint was appropriate (Uddin et al, 2013a), we attribute the cause of this 'lack of closure' to the widely-reported tendency of the ECV to underestimate the values of H and E (e.g. Mahrt, 1998;Wilson et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mahrt, 1998;Wilson et al, 2002). Uddin et al (2013a) analysed the flux foot print of the measured area and found that most of the fluxes (80%) originated from an upwind zone of about 8 m to 15 m diameter area, for a measurement height of 2.0 m and 2.5 m (depending on the weather and crop canopy conditions), i.e. within the 25 m diameter experimental area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation