2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of dynamic task related functional networks using MEG

Abstract: The characterisation of dynamic electrophysiological brain networks, which form and dissolve in order to support ongoing cognitive function, is one of the most important goals in neuroscience. Here, we introduce a method for measuring such networks in the human brain using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Previous network analyses look for brain regions that share a common temporal profile of activity. Here distinctly, we exploit the high spatio-temporal resolution of MEG to measure the temporal evolution of conn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
121
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
10
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, when estimating functional connectivity itself, most correlative or coherence based measures are highly sensitive to the number of degrees of freedom in the timecourses used to generate them. 2) In addition to the technical limitation, the well characterised dynamic nature of functional connectivity, which changes over seconds, and even milliseconds Brookes et al, 2014;Chang and Glover, 2011;Hutchison et al, 2013;G C O'Neill et al, 2015 b;O'Neill et al, 2016) must be considered, since there is a question regarding how well a short time window can capture the canonical MEG networks, if those networks are constantly changing across multiple time-scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, when estimating functional connectivity itself, most correlative or coherence based measures are highly sensitive to the number of degrees of freedom in the timecourses used to generate them. 2) In addition to the technical limitation, the well characterised dynamic nature of functional connectivity, which changes over seconds, and even milliseconds Brookes et al, 2014;Chang and Glover, 2011;Hutchison et al, 2013;G C O'Neill et al, 2015 b;O'Neill et al, 2016) must be considered, since there is a question regarding how well a short time window can capture the canonical MEG networks, if those networks are constantly changing across multiple time-scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, O'Neill et al (2016) showed that dynamic measures of functional connectivity are also variable across subjects. Although the reason for this poor reliability is not well understood, it likely results from a combination of genuine differences (Finn et al, 2015) (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It can be used to assess the formation and dissolution of brain networks in real time as they are modulated in support of cognitive tasks (e.g. Baker et al, 2014;O'Neill et al, 2017) and this has led to its use in cutting edge neuroscience (e.g. Liu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing methods to approach the BS allocation problem has been dominated by data-based approaches, including temporal sliding windows (Hansen et al, 2015;O'Neill et al, 2017), adaptive segmentations using clustering Khanna et al, 2015;Mheich et al, 2015), among others (O'Neill et al, 2018;Preti et al, 2017). Although the shortcomings of these approaches are well stablished (Hindriks et al, 2016;O'Neill et al, 2018), from a modelling perspective, their main limitation is that the temporal dynamics of BSs is not considered during estimation, but it is assessed a posteriori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%