Emotion Measurement 2016
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100508-8.00021-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Disgust Proneness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DP dimension (items 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10) was stable as it has been previously shown in the different validations of this scale [24, 31, 30], and was correctly associated with the tendency to have overactivated reactions of disgust toward various stimuli. The DS dimension (items 2, 3, 7, 9) corresponds, in the French validation of the scale, to items that are specifically sensitive to autonomic activation, such as fear or nausea, linked to feelings of disgust (« It scares me when I feel nauseous .»).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DP dimension (items 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10) was stable as it has been previously shown in the different validations of this scale [24, 31, 30], and was correctly associated with the tendency to have overactivated reactions of disgust toward various stimuli. The DS dimension (items 2, 3, 7, 9) corresponds, in the French validation of the scale, to items that are specifically sensitive to autonomic activation, such as fear or nausea, linked to feelings of disgust (« It scares me when I feel nauseous .»).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Fergus and Valentiner [24] reported similar results, and suggested that a 12-item version, without these 4 items, guaranteed better psychometric properties. Taken together, the evidence provided by previous psychometric properties suggest that DPSS-12 is the most valid measure to assess sensitivity and propensity to disgust among available versions [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A more precise operationalization of disgust proneness may require more attention to the distinct components of the construct that may differentially relate to anxiety disorder symptoms. As previously noted, disgust proneness may consist of three components (Viar-Paxton & Olatunji, in press): disgust sensitivity, disgust propensity , and disgust reactivity. More recent measurement developments have allowed researchers to begin to make more precise distinctions between the proposed facets of disgust proneness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Disgust propensity reflects one’s general tendency to experience disgust whereas disgust sensitivity is characterized by one’s negative appraisal of the experience of disgust (Olatunji & Cisler, 2009; van Overveld, de Jong, Peters, Cavanagh, & Davey, 2006). Disgust reactivity may be defined as the tendency to react with disgust when exposed to aversive stimuli (Viar-Paxton & Olatunji, in press). There is now increasing evidence that the components of disgust proneness may function as a vulnerability factor for anxiety-related disorders (Olatunji & McKay, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of differences in eating habits and foods that are considered culturally appropriate, it would be important to assess cultural beliefs. Viar-Paxton and Olatunji (2016, p. 526) have suggested that “cultures do not significantly differ in disgust responses to images of common disease vectors,” but that eating habits may be different in that they are culturally determined. Their example includes that of insects, where insects may be a main source of protein for some cultures in Africa, Asia, and South America, but that they are historically viewed as disgusting in Western cultures.…”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%