Measurement of D*± production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA

Abramowicz, H.; Abt, I.; Adamczyk, L.; Adamus, M.; Aggarwal, R.; Antonelli, S.; Antonioli, P.; Антонов, А.; Arneodo, M.; Arslan, O.; Aushev, V.; Aushev, Y.; Bachynska, O.; Bamberger, A.; Barakbaev, A. N.; Barbagli, G.; Bari, G.; Barreiro, F.; Bartosik, N.; Bartsch, D.; Basile, M.; Behnke, O.; Behr, J.; Behrens, U.; Bellagamba, L.; Bertolin, A.; Bhadra, S.; Bindi, M.; Blohm, C.; Bokhonov, V.; Bołd, T.; Boos, E.G.; Borras, K.; Boscherini, D.; Bot, D.; Brock, I.; Brownson, E.; Brugnera, R.; Brümmer, N.; Bruni, A.; Bruni, G.; Brzozowska, B.; Bussey, P.; Bylsma, B.; Caldwell, A.; Capua, M.; Carlin, R.; Catterall, C. D.; Chekanov, S.; Chwastowski, J. J.; Ciborowski, J.; Ciesielski, R.; Cifarelli, L.; Cindolo, F.; Contin, A.; Cooper-Sarkar, A. M.; Coppola, N.; Corradi, M.; Corriveau, F.; Costa, M.; D’Agostini, G.; Corso, F. Dal; Peso, J. Del; Dementiev, R. K.; Pasquale, S. De; Derrick, M.; Devenish, R.C.E.; Dobur, D.; Dolgoshein, B. A.; Dolinska, G.; Doyle, A. T.; Drugakov, V.; Durkin, L. S.; Dusini, S.; Eisenberg, Y.; Ermolov, P.; Eskreys, A.; Fang, S. S.; Fazio, S.; Ferrando, J.; Ferrero, M. I.; Figiel, J.; Foster, B.; Gach, G. P.; Galas, A.; Gallo, E.; Garfagnini, A.; Geiser, A.; Gialas, I.; Gizhko, A.; Gladilin, L. K.; Gladkov, D.; Glasman, C.; Gogota, O.; Golubkov, Yu. A.; Göttlicher, P.; Grabowska-Bołd, I.; Grebenyuk, J.; Gregor, I. M.; Grigorescu, G.; Grzelak, G.; Gueta, O.; Guzik, M. P.; Gwenlan, C.; Haas, T.; Hain, W.; Hamatsu, R.; Hart, J. C.; Hartmann, H.; Hartner, G.; Hilger, E.; Hochman, D.; Hori, R.; Hüttmann, A.; Ibrahim, Z. A.; Iga, Y.; Ingbir, R.; Ishitsuka, M.; Iudin, A.; Jakob, H.‐P.; Januschek, F.; Jones, T. W.; Jüngst, M.; Каденко, І.; Kahle, B.; Kananov, S.; Kanno, T.; Karshon, U.; Karstens, F.; Katkov, I.; Kaur, M.; Kaur, P.; Keramidas, A.; Khein, L. A.; Kim, J.Y.; Kisielewska, D.; Kitamura, S.; Klanner, R.; Klein, U.; Koffeman, E.; Kondrashova, N.; Kononenko, O.; Kooijman, P.; Korol, Ie.; Korzhavina, I. A.; Kotański, A.; Kötz, U.; Kovalchuk, N.; Kowalski, H.; Kuprash, O.; Kuze, M.; Lee, A.; Levchenko, B. B.; Levy, A.; Libov, V.; Limentani, S.; Ling, T. Y.; Lisovyi, M.; Lobodzinska, E.; Lohmann, W.; Löhr, B.; Lohrmann, E.; Long, K.; Longhin, A.; Lontkovskyi, D.; Lukina, O. Yu.; Maeda, J.; Magill, S.; Makarenko, I.; Malka, J.; Mankel, R.; Margotti, A.; Marini, G.; Martin, J. F.; Mastroberardino, A.; Mattingly, M.C.K.; Melzer-Pellmann, I.-A.; Mergelmeyer, S.; Miglioranzi, S.; Idris, F. Mohamad; Monaco, V.; Montanari, A.; Morris, J. D.; Mujkic, K.; Musgrave, B.; Nagano, K.; Namsoo, T.; Nania, R.; Nigro, A.; Ye, Ning; Nobe, T.; Notz, D.; Nowak, R. J.; Nuncio-Quiroz, A. E.; Oh, B.Y.; Okazaki, N.; Olkiewicz, K.; Onishchuk, Y.; Papageorgiu, K.; Parenti, A.; Paul, E.; Pawlak, J. M.; Pawlik, B.; Pelfer, P. G.; Pellegrino, A.; Perlański, W.; Perrey, H.; Piotrzkowski, K.; Pluciński, P.; Pokrovskiy, N. S.; Polini, A.; Proskuryakov, A.S.; Przybycień, M.; Raval, A.; Reeder, D.D.; Reisert, B.; Ren, Z.; Repond, J.; Ri, Y.D.; Robertson, A. I.; Roloff, P.; Rubinsky, I.; Ruspa, M.; Sacchi, R.; Samson, U.; Sartorelli, G.; Savin, A.A.; Saxon, D. H.; Schioppa, M.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schleper, P.; Schmidke, W. B.; Schneekloth, U.; Schönberg, V.; Schörner-Sadenius, T.; Schwartz, J.; Sciulli, F.; Shcheglova, L.M.; Shehzadi, R.; Shimizu, S.; Singh, Inderpal; Skillicorn, I. O.; Słomiński, W.; Smith, W. H.; Sola, V.; Solano, A.; Son, D.; Sosnovtsev, V.; Спиридонов, А.; Stadie, H.; Stančo, L.; Stefaniuk, N.; Stern, A.; Stewart, T. P.; Stifutkin, A.; Stopa, P.; Suchkov, S.; Susinno, G.; Suszycki, L.; Sztuk-Dambietz, J.; Szuba, D.; Szuba, J.; Tapper, A.; Tassi, E.; Terrón, J.; Theedt, T.; Tiecke, H.; Tokushuku, K.; Tomaszewska, J.; Trofymov, A.; Trusov, V.; Tsurugai, T.; Turcato, M.; Turkot, O.; Tymieniecka, T.; Vázquez, M.; Verbytskyi, A.; Viazlo, O.; Vlasov, N.; Walczak, R.; Abdullah, Wan Ahmad Tajuddin Wan; Whitmore, J. J.; Wichmann, K.; Wiggers, L.; Wing, M.; Wlasenko, M.; Wolf, G.; Wolfe, H.; Wrona, K.; Yagües-Molina, A. G.; Yamada, S.; Yamazaki, Y.; Yoshida, R.; Youngman, C.; Zakharchuk, N.; Żarnecki, A. F.; Zawiejski, L.; Zenaiev, O.; Zeuner, Wolfram Dietrich; Zhautykov, B.O.; Zhmak, N.; Zichichi, A.; Zolkapli, Z.; Zotkin, D.S.

doi:10.1007/jhep05(2013)097

Cited by 12 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 82 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…charm production [30,31] and older data [22] have been combined [32]. Predictions from NLO QCD describe all results reasonably well.…”

Section: Jhep09(2014)127mentioning

confidence: 94%

“…In figure 10, the measured σ cc r values are compared to the HERA combined results [32] as well as to the two recent results from ZEUS [30,31] which are not yet included in the combination. For the comparison, some of the measured values of this analysis were swum in Q 2 and x using Hvqdis.…”

Section: Cross Sectionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For heavy-quark transverse momenta comparable to the quark mass, next-to-leading-order (NLO) QCD calculations based on the dynamical generation of the massive quarks [1][2][3][4] are expected to provide reliable predictions. Beauty and charm production in DIS has been measured using several methods by the H1 [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and ZEUS [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Inclusive jet cross sections in beauty and charm events are used in the analysis presented here to extract the heavy-quark contribution to the proton structure function F 2 with high precision, and to measure the b-quark mass. For this purpose, the long lifetimes of the weakly decaying b and c hadrons, which make the reconstruction of their decay vertices possible, as well as their large masses were exploited.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Beauty and charm production in DIS has been measured using several methods by the H1 [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and ZEUS [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] collaborations. All but the two most recent measurements of…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Measurement of beauty and charm production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA and measurement of the beauty-quark mass

Abramowicz¹,

Abt²,

Adamczyk³

et al. 2014

J. High Energ. Phys.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The production of beauty and charm quarks in ep interactions has been studied with the ZEUS detector at HERA for exchanged four-momentum squared 5 < Q 2 < 1000 GeV 2 using an integrated luminosity of 354 pb −1 . The beauty and charm content in events with at least one jet have been extracted using the invariant mass of charged tracks associated with secondary vertices and the decay-length significance of these vertices. Differential cross sections as a function of Q 2 , Bjorken x, jet transverse energy and pseudorapidity were measured and compared with next-to-leading-order QCD calculations. The beauty and charm contributions to the proton structure functions were extracted from the double-differential cross section as a function of x and Q 2 . The running beauty-quark mass, m b at the scale m b , was determined from a QCD fit at next-to-leading order to HERA data for the first time and found to be m b (m b ) = 4.07 ± 0.14 (fit) +0.01 −0.07 (mod.) +0.05 −0.00 (param.) +0.08 −0.05 (theo.) GeV.Keywords: Lepton-Nucleon Scattering, QCD, Jets, B physics The ZEUS collaboration 53 IntroductionThe measurement of beauty and charm production in ep collisions at HERA is an important testing ground for perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics (pQCD), since the heavy-quark masses provide a hard scale that allows perturbative calculations to be made. At leading order, the dominant process for heavy-quark production at HERA is boson-gluon fusion (BGF). In this process, a virtual photon emitted by the incoming electron interacts with a gluon from the proton forming a heavy quark-antiquark pair. When the negative squared four-momentum of the virtual photon, Q 2 , is large compared to the proton mass, the interaction is referred to as deep inelastic scattering (DIS). For heavy-quark transverse momenta comparable to the quark mass, next-to-leading-order (NLO) QCD calculations based on the dynamical generation of the massive quarks [1][2][3][4] are expected to provide reliable predictions. Beauty and charm production in DIS has been measured using several methods by the H1 [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and ZEUS [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Inclusive jet cross sections in beauty and charm events are used in the analysis presented here to extract the heavy-quark contribution to the proton structure function F 2 with high precision, and to measure the b-quark mass. For this purpose, the long lifetimes of the weakly decaying b and c hadrons, which make the reconstruction of their decay vertices possible, as well as their large masses were exploited. Two discriminating variables, the significance of the reconstructed decay length and the invariant mass of the charged tracks associated with the decay vertex (secondary vertex), were used. This inclusive tagging method leads to a substantial increase in statistics with respect to previous ZEUS measurements.Differential cross sections as a function of Q 2 , the Bjorken scaling variable, x, jet transverse energy, E jet T , and pseudorapidit...

show abstract

“…charm production [30,31] and older data [22] have been combined [32]. Predictions from NLO QCD describe all results reasonably well.…”

Section: Jhep09(2014)127mentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Cross Sectionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Measurement of beauty and charm production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA and measurement of the beauty-quark mass

Abramowicz¹,

Abt²,

Adamczyk³

et al. 2014

J. High Energ. Phys.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Both the H1 and the ZEUS Collaborations have measured the production of D * + mesons using the "golden" decay channel using the HERA-I and HERA-II data [36,76,77,168,169,172] (see Table 1). The best phase-space coverage was achieved in the HERA-II H1 measurement [77]:…”

Section: Reconstruction Of Dmentioning

confidence: 99%

Charm production and QCD analysis at HERA and LHC

Zenaiev

2017

Eur. Phys. J. C

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review is devoted to the study of charm production in ep and pp collisions. The total set of measurements obtained by the two collaborations H1 and ZEUS from HERA and their combination is outlined, as well as complementary data obtained by the LHCb Collaboration at the LHC. After fitting the parton distribution functions the charm-production cross sections are predicted within perturbative QCD at next-to-leading order using the fixed-flavournumber scheme. Agreement with the data is found. The combined HERA charm data are sensitive to the c-quark mass and enabled its accurate determination. The predictions crucially depend upon the knowledge of the gluon distribution function. It is shown that the shape of the gluon distribution based on the HERA data is considerably improved by adding the measurements from LHCb and applicable down to values x of about 10 −6 , where x is the proton momentum fraction carried by a parton.

show abstract

Combination of differential D∗± cross-section measurements in deep-inelastic ep scattering at HERA

Abramowicz¹,

Abt²,

Adamczyk³

et al. 2015

J. High Energ. Phys.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

H1 and ZEUS have published single-differential cross sections for inclusive D * ±-meson production in deep-inelastic ep scattering at HERA from their respective final data sets. These cross sections are combined in the common visible phase-space region of photon virtuality Q 2 > 5 GeV 2 , electron inelasticity 0.02 < y < 0.7 and the D * ± meson's transverse momentum p T (D *) > 1.5 GeV and pseudorapidity |η(D *)| < 1.5. The combination procedure takes into account all correlations, yielding significantly reduced experimental uncertainties. Double-differential cross sections d 2 σ/dQ 2 dy are combined with earlier D * ± data, extending the kinematic range down to Q 2 > 1.5 GeV 2. Perturbative next-to-leading-order QCD predictions are compared to the results.

show abstract

Measurement of D*± production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA

Cited by 12 publications

References 82 publications

Measurement of beauty and charm production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA and measurement of the beauty-quark mass

Measurement of beauty and charm production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA and measurement of the beauty-quark mass

Charm production and QCD analysis at HERA and LHC

Combination of differential D∗± cross-section measurements in deep-inelastic ep scattering at HERA

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About